Skip to content
 

A Brief History of the Elephant and the Athletics

Posted in:

Good Monday morning, Uni Watchers. I hope everyone had a good weekend.

With the Athletics — formerly of Philadelphia, Kansas City and Oakland — moving to a temporary home in Sacramento this season, we have noticed that the elephant logo, which had appeared on the team’s jerseys, seems to have disappeared for 2025.

The first indications that the elephant has disappeared from the A’s uniforms came when the team unveiled a Sacramento patch they will sport when they begin play in their new digs. Shortly thereafter, I was able to confirm the A’s would be wearing four jerseys (last year they only wore three), two of which will now read “Athletics” instead of “Oakland.” In that piece, I also posted the style guides for each of the A’s 2025 uniforms — interestingly, no patches were shown on the SG graphics.

Shortly thereafter, the A’s unveiled a Rickey Henderson memorial patch, which will presumably be worn on all four jerseys. And a short time after that, the A’s unveiled their new gold jerseys, which were patchless. It’s possible the A’s simply shot that video before the Rickey patch was unveiled. But also in that article, I noted the A’s had their “photo day” pictures taken, in their home white jerseys, and those too were patchless — not the new Sacramento patch, not the Rickey patch…nothing. So what gives? Have the A’s actually dumped the elephant from their jerseys?

It’s been extremely popular with fans — and in fact, the elephant as a logo for the A’s dates back over 100 years, to when the Athletics first played in Philadelphia.

There are several excellent, in-depth articles on the beginnings and the history of the elephant, including from the MLB Hall of Fame and our pal, Todd Radom, both of which are worth a read.

But to keep this simple, the “cliff’s notes” version of the story is this.

In 1902, New York Giants manager John McGraw told reporters that Philadelphia manufacturer Benjamin Shibe, who owned the controlling interest in the Athletics, had a “white elephant on his hands.” This was due to the A’s, of the new American League, making headlines by buying up the contracts of some of the top players in the National League. McGraw was contemptuous of the new, upstart league, and when the A’s went on their spending spree, McGraw thought it would bankrupt the team, and he stated, “The Philadelphia club will make no money. They have a big white elephant on their hands.”

After word got back to him, A’s manager Connie Mack defiantly adopted the white elephant as the team mascot, and — the A’s did not go bankrupt, instead making the 1905 World Series. His opponent? The New York Giants, managed by McGraw. Mack gave McGraw a stuffed toy elephant at the start of the Series.

By 1909, the A’s were wearing an elephant logo on their sweaters…

… and by 1918 it turned up on the regular uniform jersey for the first time, as a jersey patch. It first appeared on the front of the uniform in 1920, and was updated for 1921-23.

The team then designed a gorgeous white elephant which they would use on their jerseys from 1924-27.

Then, rather suddenly, the A’s dropped the white elephant from the uniform in 1928. It would not appear again until 1950, when the elephant appeared as part of a larger patch celebrating Connie Mack’s 50 years as manager of the club, as seen in Todd’s graphic:

While it didn’t appear on the uniforms from 1928 on, it did make appearances on scorecards, programs and other printed material throughout the A’s tenure in Philadelphia.

When the A’s departed for Kansas City following the 1954 season, they kept the elephant as an alternate logo, and it appeared on the 1955 uniform as a sleeve patch. The A’s would keep this same uniform through the 1960 season. Charlie Finley bought the team in 1960, and by 1961, the team had new uniforms, and the elephant logo was gone again. Of course, in 1963, Finley rocked the uniform world when he dressed his team entirely in green and gold uniforms. That same year, Finley changed the team mascot from an elephant to a mule (the state animal of Missouri). Rumor has it Finley changed the logo in order to appeal to fans in the Kansas City area, who were predominantly Democrats (the GOP symbol is an elephant, while the Democratic Party logo is a donkey).

During Finley’s remaining tenure as owner, including when the team moved to Oakland in 1968, the elephant was nowhere to be found. But it got a revival under the next owner, Walter Haas. From 1988, the Athletics’ 21st season in Oakland, through their final season in Oakland in 2024, an elephant logo has adorned the left sleeve of the A’s home and road uniforms. It hasn’t always been the same elephant logo — it was white in 1988-89, then green from 1990-92. A new “modern” take on the elephant appeared from 1993-94, returning to the more traditional elephant logo from 1995 until last season.

So is the elephant patch permanently gone? It’s hard to say — so far, none of the three jerseys we’ve seen (white, green and gold) has the patch — but oddly, the Henderson patch hasn’t been seen on the gold or white jerseys, and for team photo day, the white jerseys didn’t have the new Sacramento patch either; in fact, both the white and gold jerseys we’ve seen for 2025 have been patchless. The style guide shows no patches (although the Henderson patch was announced long after the style guide was prepared, so that makes sense). It also makes sense the SG doesn’t have the new Sacramento patch — but both the Sacto AND the Henderson patches were announced prior to last week’s photo day — so it stands to reason those will be in place once the A’s begin play.

I have no inside information, but my hunch that the Sacto patch will be on (at least) the white jerseys for the 2025 season, but if the team removes it for 2026, it’s quite possible the elephant patch might return as well. I certainly won’t defend current A’s owner John Fisher (who has owned the team since 2005), but I can understand the uniforms not quite being “ready” for their Sacramento debut in spring training. Perhaps the removal of the elephant is just a one-year thing while the A’s wear the new Sacramento patch.

I certainly hope the elephant isn’t permanently gone — sure it’s been on and off the uniforms for long stretches since John McGraw first said the A’s had a “white elephant on their hands” and Connie Mack make the white elephant into a badge of honor — but it does have a long and deep history with the team in three different cities. Hopefully if it doesn’t return for the A’s temporary stay in Sacramento, it will be brought back for their next move to Las Vegas.

What do you guys think? Is it gone for good? And do you want to see it return to the uniforms, if not this year, then in the very near future?

 

 
  
 

Guess the Game from the Scoreboard

Guess The Game…

…From The Scoreboard

Today’s scoreboard comes from Steven Ptucha.

The premise of the game (GTGFTS) is simple: I’ll post a scoreboard and you guys simply identify the game depicted. In the past, I don’t know if I’ve ever completely stumped you (some are easier than others).

Here’s the Scoreboard. In the comments below, try to identify the game (date and location, as well as final score). If anything noteworthy occurred during the game, please add that in (and if you were AT the game, well bonus points for you!):

Please continue sending these in! You’re welcome to send me any scoreboard photos (with answers please), and I’ll keep running them.

 

 

Guess the Game from the Uniform


Based on the suggestion of long-time reader/contributor Jimmy Corcoran, we’ve introduced a new “game” on Uni Watch, which is similar to the popular “Guess the Game from the Scoreboard” (GTGFTS), only this one asked readers to identify the game based on the uniforms worn by teams.

Like GTGFTS, readers will be asked to guess the date, location and final score of the game from the clues provided in the photo. Sometimes the game should be somewhat easy to ascertain, while in other instances, it might be quite difficult. There will usually be a visual clue (something odd or unique to one or both of the uniforms) that will make a positive identification of one and only one game possible. Other times, there may be something significant about the game in question, like the last time a particular uniform was ever worn (one of Jimmy’s original suggestions). It’s up to YOU to figure out the game and date.

Today’s GTGFTU comes from our own Mike Engle.

Good luck and please post your guess/answer in the comments below.

 

 

And finally...

…that’s going to do it for the early post. I will have at least two additional articles today, in addition to Jamie’s Ticker, so definitely keep checking back. Unfortunately, I’ll be dealing with another family matter in the afternoon, so if there’s any breaking uni news, it may need to wait until Tuesday.

Everyone have a good Monday, and I’ll catch you back here tomorrow morning.

Till then…

Peace,

PH

Comments (30)

    The Denver White Elephants were an independent black baseball team from 1915-1925. If the A’s aren’t going to use the concept, the Rockies should do a throwback uniform.

    They should keep the Elephant, obviously. And they should do what the late 80s and early 90s Philadelphia Eagles did with their home and away uniforms—wear the green elephant on a baseball patch with white unis and wear the white elephant on a baseball patch on their color unis

    GTGFTU: 11/04/2000 – Los Angeles Kings (2), New Jersey Devils (1); Continental Airlines Arena, New Jersey.

    Winner winner! Good job!
    The one and only time Chris Terreri (identified Devils goalie) ever faced the Los Angeles Kings *in the Kings’ uniform era of black, purple, and silver,* and also at the same time *as a member of the New Jersey Devils.*
    Significance of the game? None really, but I was helping a fellow collector…he was interested in maybe buying this Terreri jersey exactly as pictured, and he wanted me to see if I could authenticate it to when the seller said it was worn. Somehow, I found this photo in my research, so it worked out for everybody! (Did my friend buy the jersey? I don’t know. But I could say “looks good to me.”) Usually I can authenticate by “photo matching” to literal distinctive marks on the jersey…not here, but the one-of-a-kind jersey matchup helped me a lot.

    John Fisher doesn’t strike me as a guy who cares much for the history and tradition of the club he owns. They could have easily incorporated the elephant into a Sacramento patch. They’ll surely do a Vegas specific patch when they finally take residence there. Given how many times they’ve relocated they could replace the elephant with a moving van.

    If it would save the As a few thousand bucks, they’d actually have the elephant pull the van rather than pay for the gas.

    I’ve seen a concept where the elephant is standing on the capitol dome, something like that would be great should the team stay in sac town.

    But of course the elephant will be back at some point. I’m honestly tired of people complaining about every move this franchise makes when most traditions of the team have been used inconsistently. The elephant doesn’t belong to Oakland, nor do the A’s. The elephant will be back (if it is really even missing from the main jerseys this season) and stomper is still the mascot.

    Plus it’s on the batting practice hats again — so it’s not even really gone.

    I was really hoping they would lean into the elephant branding. Sacramento is famously associated with the gold rush and the elephant was a very popular icon from the era. link

    Would make for some cool ‘story telling’…as they say

    Do any of the photos from the Athletics photo day have the player’s name and number on the back? The Guardians have new uniforms this year, and all of their photo day uniforms are patchless as well – because they’re blank jerseys. I wonder if it’s a side effect of the new Nike system that the full set of non-Spring Training uniforms aren’t ready yet.

    A team simply called the “athletics” demands a mascot.

    I have always LOVED the elephant both from a design standpoint and the fact that it began as an insult to the team and evolved into a big fat middle finger to the team’s doubters. As a Bay Area native there is a fun rivalry between Giants fans and A’s fans as to which team is more deserving of loyalty. Obviously they are in different leagues so the rivalry has no teeth, it’s just a way for fans to amplify their enjoyment of the season (in fact the one time this rivalry became relevant – in the Bay Area – god smote the entire area with a massive earthquake in the middle of a game). And the team has actually become the opposite of a white elephant for fear of spending more than they earn back. The white elephant means basically you’ll never recoup the value of your investment, or the cost of owning and maintaining such a spectacle far outweighs the returns you’ll get from it. The modern A’s get young talent for cheap, and the moment they prove themselves a promising member of the team, and often a future star, the team trades them off to the east coast before they have to pay their worth.

    The elephant couldn’t be more perfect for this team. And I hope it sticks around. Of course I am more than happy to see a new take on the elephant (the cool dude beach day elephant was a great take, even though Oakland isn’t exactly a beach town). A performing elephant plays right into old school Vegas, and someone out there could easily come up with some kind of new elephant logo.

    I want the A’s to drop the name all together when they move to Las Vegas, so a new expansion team could be located in Oakland at some point and use that name. Yes I know the A’s were in Philadelphia and KC, but very few remember them in KC, let alone Philadelphia.

    I would disagree about Philadelphia forgetting the A’s. They were our winningest team until the Eagles just tied them with their 5tb championship. And yes, I am aware they left in 1955, and fewer and fewer people actually saw them play here.

    The Bay Area already has the Giants. They’re not going to get a second team and if they ever did it wouldn’t be located in Oakland, it would be in San Jose.

    Quite frankly, Oakland doesn’t deserve a team. They are basically just another Bay Area suburb, way too minor of a city to get one. Plus the A’s have a much longer history than Oakland and in 20 years no-one will care that they ever played there just like no-one cares that they played in KC.

    Is it just a coincidence that the two sports teams most associated with elephants both use script A’s? Athletics and U of Alabama?

    The elephant should be involved is some of the A’s uniforms at all times. Plus the A’s should have a mascot dressed up as an elephant, just like Bama does.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *