Every performance uniform company likes to tout its newest generation of uniforms as something akin to “bigger, faster, stronger” or some other buzz word salads that are designed to make it sound like every uniform made before was comparable to the players wearing leather helmets and canvas pants from the 1920s and 1930s. So it should come as no surprise that Under Armour, which has introduced a new uniform template for its eight college teams this fall, will offer “new uniforms feature a sleek, modern look and performance enhancements only Under Armour could deliver: a lock-down fit in the pants and jerseys that is not easily grabbed by other athletes, a no-slip waistband, and improved ventilation.”
And so UA has introduced the “ARMR 037 uniform, the brand’s most innovative American football design to date.”
We should of course be skeptical of any claims made by sports apparel companies, and UA is no exception. But one of the more interesting aspects of UA’s new design is not so much the jersey, but the pants.
Take a look at the new Notre Dame uniform pictured above, on the right. Do you notice anything different about the pants?
I know, I know — most new uniform unveils now feature players with untucked undershirts — so often part of the pants are obscured. Let’s compare the new pants for ND on the left, vs. an older generation (2019) shown on the right:
Can you spot the difference? Yes, the pants on the right (like most football pants) have a belt. The new ones do not. According to UA …
The optimal fit, comfort, and functionality of the new uniforms represent years of work by the brand’s innovation and design teams to implement athlete feedback. One of the team’s goals for the new uniform iteration was to develop a better fitting pant with more secure coverage in the waist area. To achieve this, the team integrated the no-slip technology from its beloved yoga pant into the waistbands of the new football pants.
Emphasis mine. Under Armour’s Design Director of Team Sports, Kelsey Greenwell, said players complained about their pants rolling, coming down, or not staying in place and having to be adjusted while playing football. She and her team spent countless hours talking with players and designers, and conducted more than 200 meetings, in addition to comprehensive wear tests. Throughout the design process, they continued to dialogue with athletes to research and figure out how to address player concerns about the uniform pants.
“Players did not want to wear the belts; they were cutting them out,” said Greenwell. “We continue to stay up to date on sport culture and see how trends evolve. As we were hearing those trends changing, we knew we had to get after it. We don’t want to be the last to the party. We want to set the trend and give them the answers they are looking for.”
The solution, it turns out, already existed in an Under Armour product, albeit one not usually associated with football: yoga pants.
“Our team conducted numerous focus groups, where players voiced the need to consistently readjust their pants during play. To solve this, we leveraged the no-slip waistband construction from our women’s yoga pants. This seemingly small, innovative swap has made a tremendous difference for our athletes, who love the increased coverage over traditional football pants.”
It’s obviously still too early to tell if the new “innovation” will live up to the hype, but we should soon find out — the NCAA football season kicks off this weekend (the “Week 0” games), with all teams beginning play over the Labor Day weekend. But the early reviews have been positive.
“I feel like I’m naked when I’m wearing it” said a Maryland Terrapins player upon testing the new uniforms.
The pants aren’t the only innovation (the linked UA article at the top of this post goes into detail about the jerseys as well). Old UW pal/contributor/friend (and Auburn alum/devotee) Clint Richardson has a really excellent breakdown of UA’s new uniforms on his website, Auburn Uniforms. (Highly recommended reading!) We’ll be hearing from Clint next week on the new NCAAFB uniforms for 2024 as well.
It should be noted that previously, UA offered football pants with both a belt and a drawstring option, the new pants don’t — the “no slip” technology of the yoga pants is now fully integrated into the britches, and this “updated waistband construction provides more coverage and mitigates distractions by offering an improved fit that helps keep athletes’ pants in place.”
We’ve often remarked that teams who wear same color socks and pants have that “leotard” or “yoga pants” look — and in a roundabout way, that will be more true than ever!
I can see a day in the not too distant future when the football uniform is designed to look more like a Superhero costume, and will be a one-piece garment — and today’s players have been greatly influenced over the past decade or so by movies, especially those from the DC Comics and Marvel franchises. In many cases, putting on the uniform for them is akin to transforming from a mere mortal into a superhero straight out of their favorite movie (but that’s an article for another day).
For now, players can rest serene knowing their new pants were inspired by yoga pants technology.
Your thoughts?
Corporate America really is obsessed with trying to make straight men look like women, aren’t they?
That’s a weird fuckin’ take bro.
After all, Man is the new Woman.
Like how did you guys come away with that from this article? That’s beyond bizarre. You certainly realize that they also sell yoga pants for men.
I was wondering the same thing. I mean, belt or no belt, these still look like football pants to me. Not sure what aspect of them looks “womanly”…
Agreed, Zach.
Thirded, what an insecure comment
Austin,
It. Was. A. Joke.
I don’t get it.
You people will joke about your dead kid, but get offended over a joke.
Yeah Zach,
I guess you need intelligence to understand.
OK, guys. That’s enough of that, k?
link
Aren’t they already wearing yoga pants?
link
Isn’t that what these are? Looks like it to me.
“I feel like I’m naked when I’m wearing it”
TMI, dude! Dial it back a few feet.
The one piece uni has been a Uni watch topic in the past:
link
Nike has been giving players belt and belt less pants options for a quite a long time in the NFL.
Right?
Right. Never said otherwise — it’s just that UA is promoting their pants as having been inspired by their yoga pants, specifically the technology that allows them to fit snugly and remain in place.
Just a (marketing-driven) fad. They’ll eventually be back to belts of some type, once their “no-slip technology” slips down and reveals more than it should during play. Reminds me a bit about baseball uniforms. I always thought the elastic waistbands looked better than belts, but I remember Rob Dibble of the Reds loving the switch back to belts. Felt more secure. Felt more like “baseball.” The elastic waistbands and drawstrings, he said, were like playing baseball in pajamas.
with so many players now wearing tights under their football pants, I wouldn’t be surprised to see them combined into one garment in the near future. However, can’t have a one-piece jersey/pants combo, no way to show off the oversized baggy undershirt that way. Players wouldn’t tolerate that.
The tights often have thigh and hip pads built in.
Who remembers the one piece basketball uniforms that Iowa and NC State had back in 1989? They were not well received by the players. LOL Paul did a piece on the Iowa one back in 2016.
link
Am I the only one who thinks Under Armor’s designs look cheap?
I can confirm that you’re not alone in that opinion. Both pants shown look incredibly cheap. It seems like Under Armor wants “out-Nike” Nike.
I know a lot of uni watch hates the trends but I assume it’s mental and a feel. For a quick less then 10 sec play you want to feel like a hundred meter olympian.
Check back with the big 300+ -pounders. They will be the true barometers of a sansabelt football future … -C.
I was actually more enamored with the jersey template. I like how the bottom of the sleeves are actually perpendicular to the torso. They almost look like sleeves. Definitely more than Nike’s current template. Am I right?
There are sleeves on the jerseys?
“We’ve often remarked that teams who wear same color socks and pants have that “leotard” or “yoga pants” look — and in a roundabout way, that will be more true than ever!” Ugh.
I’m with Chris on the 300+ pounders. How will these look and feel for them in the trenches. Also, why don’t they ever get to model the new uniforms?
Keep in mind that yoga is a non contact activity. Football is a full contact activity. Apparel designed for one activity should not automatically work for the other. But I agree: we are moving towards one piece superhero costumes that are common in speed skating, athletics and downhill skiiing, but with the same reservation: these are also basically non contact activities. What will happen if the future onesie tears after a tackle? Will the entire uniform roll up?
This got me to thinking about what it is about the older unis that everybody seems to pine for and love so much (not so much the pants per se but the jerseys) and I’ve come to the conclusion that I think that while we talk about the font of the numbers or the logo from the 70s or whatever, what we really like about those old uniforms is that they looked like actual football uniforms, or at least the ones we grew up with. The jerseys were actual jerseys and the pants were football pants, which sort of resemble what we’ve got now but were much looser and, really, quite different from the yoga-type pants we see now. I think we mostly pine over the fit of those old unis more so than the graphics or fonts, although we talk more about graphics and fonts than the fit, which we almost never do.
I’ll add this this is probably true about baseball and basketball unis as well. Which is why you don’t see much love for the NBA unis from the 1950s. Simply stated, they didn’t fit well and the belted shorts isn’t a look anybody wants to see again.
Seems to me that the bigger linemen that have a big midsection will have these belt-less waistbands rolling and coming down.
how long ago was it the Pro Bowl experimented with a pants option that was more like yoga pants in that they were capri length. Cant remember if it was Nike or Reebok
It was all the way back in 2011 (Reebok). Thank god that look never caught on, but with the way players are wearing same color socks (tights/compression gear) under their pants, it may as well have.
link