Skip to content
 

A Uni Watch Look at 2024 Olympic Field Hockey

[Editor’s Note: As part of Uni Watch’s continuing Olympic uniform reviews, today we have an entry from our own Jamie Rathjen, who’ll be doing a deep dive into a sport that doesn’t receive much coverage here: Field Hockey. Enjoy! — PH]

__________

A Uni Watch Look at 2024 Olympic Field Hockey
by Jamie Rathjen

A total of 15 countries are represented in the two 12-team Olympic field hockey tournaments. Like some of the other team sports, they’re organized into two groups of six, from which the top four in each advance to the quarterfinals.

This piece will be different from the last time I did it because I don’t have to explain why the US women’s team didn’t qualify. They made it to Paris by putting in four honestly unbelievable performances at a January qualifying tournament in Ranchi, India. The hosts, New Zealand, and Italy were beaten in the group stage without conceding a goal, and then a dramatic fourth-quarter comeback against Japan for a 2-1 semifinal win sealed qualification before the US were kept thoroughly at arm’s length in a 2-0 victory for Germany in the final. (Japan were the third team to qualify from this tournament by beating India in the third-place game.)

I thought the US was capable of finishing fourth in their group, so the results were a tiny bit disappointing with only a draw against Spain followed by a final-day win against South Africa with both teams already eliminated. The US ended with four points, fifth in the group and ninth overall, and I was happy they were back. As you may have been able to tell from other Uni Watch Olympic pieces, those of us who are fans of lesser-followed sports get excited when they’re in the spotlight.

The tournaments used the Stade Yves-du-Manoir, which is normally used by the men’s soccer team Racing Club de France and was the former home of the much more prominent Racing 92 (descended from Racing Club de France) men’s rugby union team. It’s one of the few venues remaining from the 1924 Summer Games, where it was the main stadium.

The men’s tournament saw what was claimed to be the first game — maybe at Olympic level, maybe at international level, not sure — with male and female umpires working together.

The Netherlands made both finals, beating Germany yesterday for their first men’s gold since Sydney and playing China in the women’s today. Let’s look at what they and their competitors wore.

Argentina (M, W)

 

Sky blue kit
Black kit, men’s variation
Black kit, women’s variation

Argentina had their familiar white and sky blue striped shirts, except they wore sky blue shorts and socks for the women’s team or white shorts and socks for the the men’s team, despite often wearing black below the waist. The women’s second shirt has a blue-to-black gradient, but not as heavy as some of the other teams. The men’s team seems to have flipped the design around, so the top part is black.

Australia (M, W)

Yellow kit
Green kit

I am a really big fan of Australian teams using Indigenous artwork in their uniforms, and that’s what the entire Olympic program is doing this time. (The field hockey teams also have their own Aboriginal flag-colored design outside the Olympics.) The artwork is not as prominent as in other sports as it’s only down the sides of the shirts. The second-choice design was reversed mono-green or green/yellow/green.

Belgium (M, W)

Red kit
White kit

The thing here is those sweepy lines on the lower front, which are black on red or red-black on white. As far as I can tell everybody on the entire Belgian delegation is wearing them on their uniforms, polo shirts, or whatever else. The number font is also a little stencil-y. The men’s team were the defending gold medalists but were upset in the quarterfinals by Spain.

China (W)

Red kit
Yellow kit

Relative surprise women’s finalists after finishing fourth in their group, China have reversed red-with-yellow and yellow-with-red versions of the same design. The only additions are accents down the sides and in a rough apron shape down the front, like the Capitals.

France (M, W)

Blue kit
White kit

The hosts are not a power in the sport, unlike Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands to the east-northeast. Their automatic qualification was contingent on both teams being ranked in the top 25 in the world, which they achieved. The two combined for one point, a men’s draw with Spain.

The blue shirts are patterned off of the rest of the Olympic team with a blue to white gradient that does not extend to the sides, which looks really weird. It’s mostly solid-colored below that. The second white shirt and shorts aren’t that much more conventional, with blue accents on the right side and red on the left that match the flag when viewed from the front but flip it around from behind.

Germany (M, W)

White kit
Black kit

Germany perpetually look like a no-frills version of their soccer counterparts: white and black with not much else to look at besides ads, none of which they have here. There are some minor flag accents. They continued to wear their normal crest of the country’s coat of arms, which throughout the Olympics — since I watched a lot of it on German-speaking TV — seems to be an alternative to the German team’s logo. They also even have their normal number and NOB font, having basically just removed their ads. As you can see in both pictures, they are also among the teams that regularly wear rainbow captain’s armbands or sock-bands (the latter often happens with sleeveless shirts).

Great Britain (M, W)

Red kit
White kit

Unlike other sports, the British national teams coexist with those for England, Scotland, and Wales and qualified in their own rights. I do really like the font on these shirts, although it seems like all the Adidas teams at these tournaments got the same one at least for the country-name-on-front. But both teams have odd not-quite-side-stripes on both of their shirts, which are a little more visible on the men’s shirts. The women’s team wore a mono-red combo instead of red/blue/blue.

India (M)

Blue kit
White kit

India normally wears a faux-Devanagari “India” script. Here it’s just a block font. They’ve gone with contrasting raglan sleeves in blue-on-white and white-on-blue designs that are not exact opposites of each other and is certainly a new look to me. The white second shirt also has a bit of a pattern going on with its different blue swirly lines, and the orange socks it was worn with are a really good idea to add a bit of color.

Ireland (M)

Green kit
White kit

It’s pretty simple green/white/green and white/green/white here, with an additional green shoulder yoke on the white shirt. It looks like the green shorts are darker than the green on the white shirt, almost like they were supposed to be worn with the green shirt which they do match. But the accents on the sides do use the lighter shade.

Japan (W)

Reddish-pink kit
White kit

Japan always goes heavy on the cherry blossoms, as that’s their nickname. The first choice is mono-pinkish-red and the second choice is white/blue/blue, which is the shirt that actually includes pink cherry blossoms. But while the shirts and shorts both have their own patterns — an especially wild one I can’t quite describe on the blue shorts — the socks don’t, which looks a little off.

Netherlands (M, W)

Orange kit
White kit

The Dutch just released new kits not that long ago, and they’re wearing them here with the differences of a “Netherlands” script across the front and the Olympic team crest. I’m not sure these kits had actually been worn before this tournament. The font is a lot better than what Adidas has come up with for soccer, and the shade of orange used is perfect. The second kit is white/sky blue/white and only features orange accents.

New Zealand (M)

Black kit
White kit

A lot of New Zealand teams go mono-white and mono-black, and that’s what we get here, complete with an Arial-looking number font. The men’s team usually goes sleeveless but is not so this time because they have a different outfitter in New Balance.

South Africa (M, W)

Green kit
White kit

SA stepped way back from the protea-based design used in Tokyo, instead going the same route as a lot of the other teams. Solid colors, country name on front, nothing much else to see. I do like the green/green/gold combo because it (a) is proven to be good as it’s Uni Watch colors and (b) isn’t mono. This is a sport where I like dark/dark/light combos a lot because it tends to make the socks pop.

Spain (M, W)

Red kit
White kit

The two red and white shirts both have a pretty unusual flag-colored stripe going straight down the center front. The men’s team adds polo collars. The crest of the Spanish Olympic logo even makes it into the middle of the shirts, not on the upper left as is usual.

United States (W)

Red kit
White kit

The US wore their normal kits — made by Osaka, so the swoosh isn’t all-pervading — with a red-to-blue gradient and the “USA” Olympic text logo on the front. A flag replaces the normal crest. Usually blue is second choice, but here the third white option in this set appeared for I think the first time for the senior women’s team in the last group game against South Africa. It isn’t normally used much except as a shirt for goalies.

 
  
 
Comments (8)

    Great reporting Jamie! I love the use of the rainbow captain’s bands.

    Those Argentina kits are navy, not black, no?

    Possibly, but I have a hard time telling for sure. I think it definitely is black below the waist, though.

    Nice work, Jamie!

    This one is a little more difficult to evaluate, because the position the players are in with their sticks makes it difficult to get a good look at the uniforms.

    I like most of these. Happy that the Netherlands did away with the sublimation business that ruined volleyball and handball jerseys. I like Spain, South Africa, Ireland, China, Australia, and the Belgium white kit. I am a big fan of the Argentinian sky blue stripes across all platforms, but man that looks brutal on the blue field! (Also I think it looks better with the black shorts.)

    Jamie: What is your take on the United States women’s team taking on the nickname “United Eagles,” and the men taking the moniker “United Wolves”?

    (I’ve always called them The Applebees or the Boys in Blue.)

    Also: the United States has been a predominantly red team since the late 70s. They wore light blue in the 50s, but it’s hard for me to discern (because of black-and-white film/photos) what the colors were for their pinafores before the second World War. I might have to go to Ursinus to see what is in the Hall of Fame.

    It’s a fine enough idea, I like both of the crests, and for people who don’t know, other countries also do that (for example, Australia men’s is the Kookaburras and Australia women’s is the Hockeyroos). But the weird thing to me is that men’s teams don’t actually wear the wolf crest, they still wear the eagle crest. So it’s not quite everything it could be.

    Great article. Not a field hockey fan at all but being Dutch I agree that the uniforms of my country are in the right hue of orange for once tis time, with no ugly or weird gradients. Our soccer uniforms for 2024 were not very pleasing to the eye, especially this almost neon hue of orange which made them look like roadworkers or garbagemen. This is a much better choice.
    Overall I like the Australians best, silver for Oranje and bronze for the Japanese Sakura.

    Fantastic work, Jamie. And a hard agreement on your point about fans of lesser-watched sports in the U.S. getting excited to see them on the grand stage during the Olympics. Every two years it’s always so much fun.

Comments are closed.