This real money site caters to all players, with reviews on mobile games you can play, including slots, blackjack, and roulette.

A Look at Yesterday’s Cubs/Sox Throwback Game

The Cubs and White Sox held the first of their two late-1950s throwback games yesterday. As I explained last week (and as you can see above), all the Cubs wore No. 14 in honor of Ernie Banks. All of the White Sox players will wear No. 9 for Minnie Minoso when the teams again wear throwbacks on Aug. 14.

Interestingly, all of those No. 14s were rendered in the Cubbies’ current number style, complete with the red outline. Although I haven’t been able to find a good color photo, I’m about 99% sure that the Cubs’ numbers during this period did not have the red outlining. If so, that’s a surprising lapse.

Turning to the all-important lower-leg region, the good news is that the Cubs all went high-cuffed. The bad news is that they wore two-in-ones — a really disappointing move (click to enlarge):

The worst thing about this is that the new Under Armour two-in-ones, while not as good as real stirrups, are much better than the standard Twin City Knitting two-in-ones.

The White Sox also went high-cuffed. Most wore solid black socks, although at least one of them wore genuine stirrups (click to enlarge):

One interesting detail: The Cubs’ Ernie Banks memorial patch, which they’ve been wearing all season long, was omitted. I understand why they did it — after all, they were all wearing No. 14, which was a high level of remembrance — but it’s still a bit odd that a game dedicated to Banks will go down as the one time this season that the Cubs didn’t wear the Banks patch (click to enlarge):

By contrast, the Chisox’s Minnie Minoso patch was included on the right sleeve, where it’s been all season long — it’ll be interesting to see if they retain it on Aug. 14, when they’ll all be wearing No. 9 (click to enlarge):

(Special thanks to Ben Schmuck and Phil for the two-in-one photos.)

• • • • •

And speaking of throwbacks”¦: In case you missed it, Saturday was the 25th anniversary of the first throwback game in MLB history, and I marked the occasion with a big ESPN column on the best throwback uni worn by each MLB team. Enjoy.

• • • • •

Raffle reminder: In case you missed it last week, I’m raffling off a pair of Mizuno MLB All-Star Game cleats, Size 10. To enter, send an email with your name and shipping info to the raffle address by 7pm Eastern tomorrow, July 14 ”” the date of the All-Star Game. One entry per person. I’ll announce the winner on Wednesday the 15th.

• • • • •

Baseball News: I’m quoted at length, as is SportsLogos.net founder Chris Creamer, in this article about the Hartford Yard Goats’ new logos. ”¦ Here’s something I didn’t know: The baselines in the 1965 MLB All-Star Game were red, white, and blue. You can see more of that in this headline video (big thanks to Sean Farrell). ”¦ man, it’s a big drop down from the MLB ASG to the triple-A ASG. ”¦ While I’ve had more than enough of military appreciation nights, at least the Charleston RiverDogs managed to come up with a uniform theme that didn’t involve camouflage. The green unis were supposed to look like plastic green Army men. ”¦ Game of Thrones jerseys upcoming for the Staten Island Yankees. ”¦ Twins closer Glenn Perkins received a goalie mask from his bullpenmates — you know, because he gets saves, a goalie makes saves, etc. ”¦ Blue Jays and Royals and an umpire — all in blue yesterday (from Craig Sarson). ”¦ Star Wars jerseys for the Brazos Valley Bombers (from @ballparksocial). ”¦ The Pirate Parrot — that’s the Buccos’ live mascot — has two assistants with “Birdkeeper” NOBs. ”¦ Check out this Jackie Robinson Christmas tree ornament, which has his No. 42 but doesn’t have the Dodgers script. Interestingly, the listing says the ornament is “Licensed by Mrs. Rachel Robinson, c/o Estate of Jackie Robinson,” but I guess it wasn’t licensed by MLB (from David Cline).

NBA News: If you tried to create a composite logo for each NBA team, drawing upon each component of a team’s visual history to come up with an “overall” logo, it might look like this (from AW Rader).

Soccer News: Man, even if you like green and gold as much as I do, that new Norwich kit is really, uh, something (from Brian Mazmanian). ”¦ “The Women’s Super League season kicked off this weekend in England,” says Yusuke Toyoda. “Most teams are affiliated with top men’s teams and wear the same unis — Arsenal Ladies and Manchester City Ladies wore their club’s new 2015 kits, but Liverpool (still wearing Warrior instead of New Balance) and Chelsea (with a makeshift shirt sponsor) wore last season’s unis.” ”¦ Also from Yusuke: CD Guadalajara, a third division team in Spain, released a rainbow-themed jersey supporting LGBT rights. ”¦ An online petition is urging FC Barcelona to drop Qatar Airlines as its jersey advertiser. ”¦ New home kit for FC Shakhtar (from @espitt).

Grab Bag: For nearly 30 years now, the only sneakers I’ve purchased or worn have been Chucks. But the other day I saw these two-tone Vans at a vintage shop and thought, “Why not?” Broadening my horizons, little by (very) little. ”¦ Player badges at the British Open have changed from round to oval (from Chris Flinn). ”¦ NASCAR driver Cole Whitt, who’s sponsored by KFC, has a Col. Sanders-themed racing suit. ”¦ Unusual scenario for Saturday’s welterweight title bout between champion Keith Thurman and challenger Luis Collazo, both of whom wore red trunks, red gloves, and red shoes. ”¦ Interesting piece on the history of the polo shirt. ”¦ New Rugby World Cup uniforms for Japan (from Jeremy Brahm). ”¦ Matthew Blinco recently visited the San Diego Hall of Champions and took some swell photos. ”¦ Several riders in the Tour de France are using a new time trial helmet design.

•  •  •  •  •

What Paul did last night yesterday: Yesterday was a perfect summer day, at least here in NYC — sunny, hot but not too hot, low humidity, a nice breeze. It was a perfect day, in other words, to go out to my favorite seafood shack out in Sheepshead Bay and chow down on some Maryland-style crabs. So that’s precisely what my friends Carrie, Howard, Sujan, Emily, Eric, and I did.

Hot crabs and cold beer — an unbeatable combination on a summer day (click to enlarge):

68 comments to A Look at Yesterday’s Cubs/Sox Throwback Game

  • BurghFan | July 13, 2015 at 7:18 am |

    Typo in second sentence: “(and as youp can see above)”

  • DJ | July 13, 2015 at 7:34 am |

    I thought Dexter Fowler wore blue stirrups for the Cubs.

  • Toddro | July 13, 2015 at 8:13 am |

    I live in Maryland and haven’t picked crabs yet this season. That is so very unacceptable.

    • Name redacted | July 13, 2015 at 11:46 am |

      As a life-long MD resident, with all the places that now make okay to great crab cakes locally, i’m happy to never pick crabs by hand again.

      The reward never equalled the struggle for me. :)

    • duker | July 13, 2015 at 12:08 pm |

      As a Marylander my only critique of the crabs pictured is that they need about 10x more Old Bay.

      • Toddro | July 13, 2015 at 1:50 pm |

        I agree, they are extremely light on the Old Bay.

        and you need a bowl of vinegar for dipping

  • MJ | July 13, 2015 at 8:31 am |

    1. The 3rd and 5th Cubs from left in the top picture (can’t tell who’s who of everyone is #14!!) are wearing real stirrups.
    2. My kids bought me my first pair of Vans for Father’s Day. My new summer casual shoe but I still keep a couple pair of Chucks around, because Chucks are awesome.

  • Big Matt | July 13, 2015 at 8:32 am |

    Something tells me that there would have been complaints if the Cubs HAD worn the Banks memorial patch on Sunday…..Damned if you, damned if you don’t

    • Phil Hecken | July 13, 2015 at 9:18 am |

      I’m in agreement here — not that Paul necessarily would have complained, but if you’re throwing back specifically to a period to honor a player, you’d think they’d make the uni as accurate as possible (which, with the red trimmed-numbers and 2-in-1’s, plus the Majestic patch, they clearly did not). At least keeping the memorial patch off the uni made it somewhat more authentic to the actual uni Ernie wore.

    • arrScott | July 13, 2015 at 10:39 am |

      By all wearing #14, the Cubs were effectively each wearing Ernie’s uniform. So symbolically, including the patch would have meant Ernie Banks wearing his own memorial patch. Which seems kind of creepy to me, akin to commercials where anthropomorphic food cartoons urge eating themselves.

      • Jim Vilk | July 13, 2015 at 1:26 pm |

        By all wearing #14, the Cubs were effectively each wearing Ernie’s uniform. So symbolically, including the patch would have meant Ernie Banks wearing his own memorial patch. Which seems kind of creepy to me, akin to commercials where anthropomorphic food cartoons urge eating themselves.

  • Gazzoo | July 13, 2015 at 8:41 am |

    You are correct, the Cubs didn’t add red trim to their numbers till the ’90s, when they also added NOB.

    • Gazzoo | July 13, 2015 at 10:03 am |

      Just to clarify, for a while during the 60’s the Cubs did have red trim on their road uni numbers, but not on the home pinstripes.

    • MTS | July 13, 2015 at 12:06 pm |

      NOB and red trimmed numbers were added to the Cubs’ home uniforms in 1993 if memory serves.

  • Aaron | July 13, 2015 at 8:42 am |

    Wouldn’t have pegged Paul to be a Budweiser guy. Interesting.

    • Attila Szendrodi | July 13, 2015 at 11:48 am |

      Does it even count as a beer?

      • Chuck | July 13, 2015 at 12:13 pm |

        Absolutely not

    • Toddro | July 14, 2015 at 6:51 am |

      you don’t drink good beer when you pick crabs. Any InBev product will do

  • Bo | July 13, 2015 at 8:42 am |

    Twitter says the Cole Whitt KFC tweet is not existing…

  • Adam | July 13, 2015 at 8:44 am |

    Drooling over those hardshells. That was my faviorite thing about growing up in the Chesapeake area. It’s been ages since I’ve had them. People down south just don’t understand.

  • scottrj | July 13, 2015 at 8:49 am |

    Picking crabs wearing a lobster bib? That’s heresy.

  • Dave Rakowski | July 13, 2015 at 9:14 am |

    Did you get those fuzzy pants with the Vans? (jk)

  • LT | July 13, 2015 at 9:27 am |

    I understand that 2 in 1s weren’t worn in the Ernie banks era but in general I love them. That’s what was given to us when we were little kids just starting to play and so when I see them I harken back to a simpler time. I don’t really understand the vitriol as they are better than the baggy pants but albeit not as good as stirrups.

    That’s just my two cents. I’m trying to stand up for the 2 in 1s!

    • tbone | July 13, 2015 at 12:17 pm |

      They remind me of MLB when I was growing up in the 80s. It seemed a fair amount of players wore them. I’d love to know the history or rationale behind them. Players today don’t care if they have a stirrup look or not (and most go low-cuffed so you never see it anyway), so why did they need to have pretend stirrups then? Couldn’t players have gone with solid-color socks, as many do today?

    • RobYaz | July 13, 2015 at 2:25 pm |

      I get that the look of stirrups is authentic old-school basbeall, and a million times better than pajama pants (I keep waiting for a guy in a rundown to trip on his own pants – has that happened yet?) but when I played youth baseball I always found that strip of extra fabric under/around my foot to be really annoying, and much preferred a smoother, seamless feel on my feet. Can see why most ballplayers would not like to wear actual stirrups.

  • Rich | July 13, 2015 at 9:41 am |

    Not sure about the red stripe, either. Cubs uniforms I’ve seen from the late-60s into the ’90s did not have trim on the home uniform numbers. I think the red outline on Cubs home uniform numbers came into play in 1993 when they took away the blue collar and blue sleeve stripe.

    When did the Cubs add the bear-head logo to their sleeves?

    • Rich | July 13, 2015 at 9:42 am |

      The reason I ask is because the throwbacks from yesterday’s game did not have the bear-head logo.

    • Mark in Shiga | July 13, 2015 at 9:56 am |

      They actually had the blue sleeve stripe in 1993, when they started putting names on the home uniforms for the first time ever, and then it was removed the next year. The blue sleeves looked good with the blue numbers but seemed a little out of place when the numbers got red borders.

      (Those hemmed sleeves used to be standard and then have gradually disappeared from most teams’ jerseys. I’m trying to think of teams who have never dropped theirs: the Phillies on the road and the White Sox on the road come to mind. I like seeing those stripes on otherwise-dull gray uniforms, but not with pinstripes.)

      I’m hoping, with all the throwback uniforms the Cubs have been wearing in recent years, that the Cubs will go back to something more traditional at home soon, or at least as a home alternate like Cleveland and the Twins do. All of the Cubs’ 1930s through 1960s home uniforms look amazing and timeless.

    • scottrj | July 13, 2015 at 10:01 am |

      Well, they were wearing red-outlined numbers on their away unis at the time (speaking of which, a pink background!?):
      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_N0qDKRsrWVo/SY97V824bjI/AAAAAAAAAbQ/214OxtklNMA/s320/Topps+1959+Drabowsky.jpg
      That is, when they weren’t wearing blue-outlined red numbers on the away unis:
      http://www.joesvintagesportscards.com/mm5/graphics/CSUngraded_Pics_2014/S1_726126.jpg

      As all over the place as they were, it wouldn’t shock if at some point they did likewise on the home unis. It’s a better look anyway:
      http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-h7CFEO4p82M/U9SMM2ebi0I/AAAAAAAAIu4/E-ZlbNQoIqE/s400/1967+Billy+Williams+(f).jpg

      • Gazzoo | July 13, 2015 at 12:28 pm |

        At some point earlier in the team’s history it’s possible they had red trim on the home uni numbers, but the pinstripe set (introduced in 1957) didn’t have the trim until 1993…

  • Clevo | July 13, 2015 at 9:56 am |

    Looks like Arsenal ladies don’t have the buttons like the men.

  • Dave | July 13, 2015 at 10:27 am |

    Bad news for Jackie Robinson. There is a definite jinx attached to the Hallmark ornaments — and being dead doesn’t necessarily save you!

    http://metsguyinmichigan.blogspot.com/2010/08/injured-ryan-howard-is-latest-victim-of.html

    Kidding aside, I liked the Hallmark baseball ornaments — when they had the league license. Logoless jerseys aren’t any fun.

  • Bill H | July 13, 2015 at 10:52 am |

    Sure that’s not Sasquatch in those vans?

  • kyle | July 13, 2015 at 11:03 am |

    Who is wearing the really thin stirrups in the lead photo? 2nd from the right? Are those built in?

  • Mark M | July 13, 2015 at 11:09 am |

    MLS All-star Game Kit has Leaked. That is “interesting.”

    • DJ | July 13, 2015 at 3:27 pm |

      Bad link.

  • Attila Szendrodi | July 13, 2015 at 11:50 am |

    Some of those composite NBA logos are really nice. Be interesting to see that method applied to the other 2 of the big 3 leagues.

    • Jim Vilk | July 13, 2015 at 1:32 pm |

      That Clippers one is a million percent better than their new look.

      The Pistons (spits on ground) really need to bring back that mascot. I would almost like them if they did.

      • Attila Szendrodi | July 13, 2015 at 2:34 pm |

        I loved the Cavs, Suns, Warriors, & Nugs.

        Agree about the Clippers but its more like one billion.

  • Name redacted | July 13, 2015 at 11:51 am |

    Small nitpick

    The WSL season in England resumed after the World Cup hiatus, not kicked off.

  • signifying monkey | July 13, 2015 at 11:52 am |

    Sox should have had numbers on their sleeves.

    • Thomas J | July 13, 2015 at 12:15 pm |

      Shame since the sleeve numbers are one reason those unis are so cool.

      Also no stripes on the socks, big missed opportunity.

      • DJ | July 13, 2015 at 1:46 pm |

        The Sox will have number 9 on the sleeves when they do their tribute in August. Not sure if they’ll have the proper striped socks (red white and black stripes on black stirrups).

  • dgm9 | July 13, 2015 at 12:23 pm |

    I though Paul’s comments regarding Brandiose in the Yard Goats article were spot on. You can tell a Brandiose design from a mile away, for better or for worse.

    Recently one of the Brandiose guys was on a Padres podcast where he essentially “non-confirm confirmed” that they have been working with the Padres in the anxiously awaited redesign which most fans think is coming next year. It makes sense – SD-based sports design company working with SD-based sports team and all that. But considering how consistently similar Brandiose’s designs have been up to this point I’m a little worried the Padres may end up looking like a minor league team.

    Like all San Diego sports fans, here’s hoping for the best and expecting the worst.

    • Dave | July 13, 2015 at 1:13 pm |

      Does a team bring Brandiose in after the name has been selected, or is the firm part of the name-selection process?

      There is certainly a common thread among its designs, and many seem to have animals or give human traits to non-human things. (Did the company do the Nuts?)

      • Paul Lukas | July 13, 2015 at 1:46 pm |

        Varies by project.

        • Dave | July 13, 2015 at 3:37 pm |

          Thanks! I was always curious about that.

    • arrScott | July 13, 2015 at 4:10 pm |

      Yes and no. There’s certainly a default Brandiose look that’s visible a mile away. But Brandiose has also produced some projects, not coincidentally their best work, that don’t scream “Generic Brandiose Team.” The updated Mr. Redlegs, for example, or the quietly underrated Spokane Indians. If the Padres redesign turns out to be bush-league, with an overly cartoony swinging friar and hippy-dippy lettering all rendered with too-thick outlines and one-too-many primary colors, I’ll blame the client, not the studio.

      • dgm9 | July 13, 2015 at 5:37 pm |

        Yeah, the guy mentioned in the podcast how proud he was (/they were) of the Spokane Indians stuff. It’s not bad, but still does look minor league-y to me. Honestly, as long as the Padres redesign includes brown and the SD monogram I won’t be too bothered.

    • Thresh8 | July 13, 2015 at 6:16 pm |

      I enjoyed the article, especially glad that the two things I picked up on as a Nutmegger were noticed: Whalers’ blue and green, and the NYNH&HRR typeface.

  • Thomas J | July 13, 2015 at 12:28 pm |

    Odd little detail, Minnie Minoso wasn’t on the White Sox in 1958.

    • Thomas J | July 13, 2015 at 12:35 pm |

      Ernie Banks and Minnie Minoso were both in Chicago from 1953-1957, along with 1961-62, and 1964. So out of the 8 possible seasons to throwback to in which both men called Chicago home, they officially went with none of them.

  • Mark in Shiga | July 13, 2015 at 3:02 pm |

    Fantastic piece of trivia that I just discovered now:

    * Winning pitcher for the Cubs in the game yesterday: Jake Arrieta.

    * Minnie Minoso’s mother’s maiden name: Arrieta.

  • Winter | July 13, 2015 at 4:24 pm |

    Some of those composite NBA logos look better than the current ones. I’m particularly fond of the Cavs and the Wolves.

  • Matthew | July 13, 2015 at 4:52 pm |

    When the Coyotes new jerseys were announced, Howler’s M captaincy patch was where it was on the old jersey. It’s now been updated, confirming that is where the patches will be.

    https://twitter.com/johnhisc2/status/620238908463296513

    https://twitter.com/HowlerCoyote

  • Jason in Denver | July 13, 2015 at 6:27 pm |

    Honestly shocked there was nothing about the Rockies in camo on Sunday.

    I have no idea why they would do it, and I would have SWORN someone would have sent something to you about it, which is why I didn’t. I figured by the time I saw it in the 5th, you’d have 4-5 people say something by then…

  • Rob | July 13, 2015 at 7:11 pm |

    Clementes? Or Randazzos?

    • Paul Lukas | July 13, 2015 at 7:26 pm |

      Clemente’s.

  • Dan T. | July 13, 2015 at 8:08 pm |

    So does the fact that a major league baseball game can take place with everybody wearing the same number basically mean there is no reason to continue to have numbers on baseball uniforms?

    Baseball does seem to be the sport where there is never in the moment of action a time when a player would need to quickly identify another player by sight…

    So why bother? Wouldn’t baseball uniforms look cleaner, and more “uniform” without numbers at all?

    • Paul Lukas | July 13, 2015 at 8:42 pm |

      I’ve never heard this analysis before. Certainly not on April 16 each year.

      • Dan T. | July 13, 2015 at 8:52 pm |

        Well, imagine trying to play an NFL or NBA game with everybody wearing the same number…

        I guess numbers for baseball players were strictly for the fan’s benefit…in the old days, you needed a program to tell the players by their number. Now, the scoreboard, PA announcer, etc. tells everybody who is at bat…

  • Rydell | July 13, 2015 at 8:32 pm |

    Beauty summer meal Paul looks deelish.
    I ordered crabs at a crab shack in Everglades City FLA and they served them chilled, not good.

  • Max Feinleib | July 13, 2015 at 10:43 pm |

    3 things about the HR Derby:
    1. ‘Gillette Home Run Derby Presented by Head and Shoulders’ is quite a mouthful.
    2. Champ Pederson was wearing a frankenjersey of his brother Joc. The funny part is that it was Dodger blue/Dodger white.
    3. Todd Frazier needs major hairline help.