As we’ve discussed here several times, many NBA team logos include an image of a basketball. This was a particular concern a few years ago, when the league briefly tried to introduce a new ball design, which led me (and probably others) to wonder if all those teams would have to revise their logos.
That question became moot when the new ball experiment was abandoned. But a larger question remains: Why do so many NBA teams have basketballs in their logos? Is this an intentional or strategic point of difference with the other leagues (since most NFL team logos don’t include a football, most MLB logos don’t include a baseball, etc.)? Just a coincidence that’s developed over the years? Something else altogether? And when the NBA commissions a new logo, is the designer specifically instructed to include a basketball, or has it just worked out that way?
I recently posed those questions to NBA apparel director Christopher Arena (one of the really good guys in the uni world, by the way). Here’s what he wrote back:
When we started the WNBA, we were very focused on ball icons in the logos (specifically a multi-colored ball). This was branding 101 — new league, awareness, blah-blah-blah. Same thing when we started to develop the D-League logos — no one knows who we are, lots of minor league sports competition, must show that we are about the game of basketball.
On the NBA side, it sort of just happened. Almost every team logo was developed prior to my 15 seasons here, so I don’t know if it is intentional or not. But as a young league, my guess is that in the ’40s and ’50s maybe they had the same brand-building concerns. I will say that as new logos have been created or updated, we have suggested that a basketball icon (not necessarily a ball) be integrated into the identity. Not necessarily the primary logo but maybe a secondary logo.
So we have:
• Teams with basketball icons in their primary logo: 23, if you count Portland (the 5-on-5 inspiration) and Houston (the net inspiration). Most of these are the original designs (Lakers, Celtics, Wizards, Pacers) or are updates of logos that had a basketball (Knicks, Pistons, Suns).
• Teams with basketball icons in their secondary logo but not their primary: 5. Interestingly, some of these are very new logos and we didn’t include it in the primary but felt it fit in a secondary — Bobcats, Wolves, Grizzlies, Bucks, and Nuggets (older but same principle).
• Teams with no basketball icon: Bulls, Spurs.
I would say that if a team approached me tomorrow about changing its logo, we would suggest a ball or net or something be somewhere in the identity. As for the other sports leagues, I think baseballs or bases or diamonds are in a lot of the primary [MLB] logos, but they are so hat-icon-based that it gets lost (the Brewers’ old mb logo is still best of all time). Same thing with the NFL and helmet logos, which sort of developed into the actual logos. Plus a football has an odd shape — basketballs and roundness and symmetry are easier to work with.
All very interesting. Personally, though, I think the use of basketballs in NBA logos is overdone. This is no longer a young league (sure it’s a lot younger than the NFL or MLB, but there’s a whole generation of fans who don’t know or care about that), so no need to say, “Hey, this game we’re playing here is BASKETBALL.” And the repetition of the ball throughout so many of the marks starts to feel willful after a while — like, “We’re doing it because we have to do it, because that’s just the way we do it.” Or to put it another way, “Because we have to” can be just as damaging as “Because we can.”
Big thanks to Christopher for sharing his time and expertise on this — much obliged.
Uni Watch News Ticker: Adrian Beltre is now wearing a cup. ”¦ David McGee notes that Curenski Gilleylen’s NOB was misspelled on last weekend. ”¦ Brilliant account of the Mets’ season here. Click on the board spaces for the full effect (with thanks to Scott Turner). ”¦ The AFL throwbacks are now available on Madden (with thanks to Paul Ricciardi). ”¦ Remember Mark Penxa and his awesome baseball watercolors? Looks like he’s starting a hockey series. ”¦ Yesterday I linked to some photos of the Pacific Coast League exhibit at SFO Airport. Now John Moist has provided some much clearer photos. ”¦ “I’m shocked that nobody from the great state of Michigan has dropped you a line regarding our new QB, Dernard Robinson,” writes Ethan Crooks. “Robinson has never tied his spikes at any level, resulting in the nickname ‘Shoelace,’ which has followed him up to Michigan.” Yeah, okay, but leaving your laces untied doesn’t mean so much if you’re just gonna apply a heavy spat job. ”¦ Can someone please get this guy an NEA grant or something? (Big thanks to Nile Smith.) ”¦ Looks like the UFL is going to be quite the pioneer. ”¦ More about the Seahawks’ green jerseys, from a source who prefers to remain anonymous: “As a student football equipment manager at a school in Wisconsin, we used to drive up to Ripon Athletic quite frequently to get stuff last minute (nameplates, etc.) and I had an opportunity on a brief tour to see some Seahawks ‘all lime green’ pants and jerseys (a coordinating set) that were being prototyped. They actually had huge rolls of the nasty-colored material that had to be custom-made overseas because up to that time no one had ordered anything that color. I remember the boss saying they were going to be ‘stuck’ with it at the time. So that stuff does exist.” ”¦ Now that’s a uniform. It’s from the Festival of the Babes, described as “a women’s soccer festival for lesbians and those willing to be mistaken for one.” Lots of additional photos on this page (with thanks to Bob Wilmot). ”¦ New uniforms unveiled yesterday for the WHL, OHL, and LHJMQ. ”¦ If you believe the Earthlink mail server, which I don’t, I received exactly zero e-mails from 6pm yesterday until about 7am today. If you sent me anything during that period, please re-send it, because for now it appears that everything sent my way during that 13-hour stretch has fallen into a deep black hole. Thanks.