Skip to content
 

Ties That Bind

tie.gif

Twenty-odd years ago, before he reinvented himself as the indie-rock act called Smog, Bill Callahan published a cool little fanzine called Disaster. In 1986, while reviewing an LP by the British punk band the Membranes, he noted disapprovingly that one of them wore a tie. “The tie is universal,” he wrote. “It fairly screams: I’VE GOT A PIECE OF CLOTH AROUND MY NECK. I AM A DINK.”

I think of that line every time I wear a tie (which isn’t very often these days, thanks to the whole work-at-home thing). I also thought of it the other day when I was clicking through some old-timey baseball photos and came across something I’d never seen before: a ballplayer wearing a bow tie. The player in question is Cal McVey, who played for Boston of the National Association from 1871-75, so that’s how old the photo is.

Coaches notwithstanding, neckties in the sports world are uncommon but not unheard of. Early golfers and tennis players usually wore ties, reflecting the more genteel, formal era in which they played, and women’s teams in many sports wore cravats (a protocol preserved today in the world of granny basketball). Then there are horse racing jockeys, who often have little faux bow ties sewn into their silks — not quite the same as genuine neckwear, but close enough for our purposes.

But the people most likely to be wearing ties are the officials — not surprising, since more formal clothing usually implies greater power and authority. In baseball’s early days, umpires often wore a top hat and tails, and big league umps were still wearing ties as recently as 1969. Hockey officials used to be tie-clad too, and early NFL officials wore bow ties. I haven’t been able to find any photos of that, although I do have this early college football photo where you can see the refs wearing hats, jackets, and ties. Although the officials in these sports now dress more casually, ties can still be found on many boxing refs and tennis chair umpires (and, at Wimbledon, the linesmen).

There are probably other examples I’m missing — let’s have ’em. And if you’re wearing a tie while reading this, my sympathies.

(Special thanks to Michael Ferry, who pointed me to the series of archival photos where I found the Cal McVey shot — look here and here.)

Research Request: With all the recent chatter about players wearing No. 42 in honor of Jackie Robinson, I want to compile as big a list as possible of players who wear particular uni numbers for particular reasons, whether due to superstition, as a memorial gesture, or whatever. Jason Giambi wears 25 because it adds up to 7 (Mickey Mantle’s number), for example, and Gilbert Arenas wears zero because that’s the number of minutes he was told he’d get to play at Arizona — that sort of thing.

All sports are fair game. Ideally, I’d like to come up with at least one example for every number 00 to 99; the upper part of that range will definitely be more challenging, so high-numbered contributions are particularly welcome. Send all your suggestions here.

Uni Watch News Ticker: Baseball-related cartoons in The New Yorker almost always show the players wearing stirrups (note that the ones worn by the pitcher are backwards — the higher opening should be in the back, not the front). ”¦ Reprinted from yesterday’s comments: Moderately interesting piece here about how the Astros’ equipment manager had to scramble to get a full set of 42 jerseys for April 15th. ”¦ Reader Tim Donovan has pointed me toward a really great video series about Chicago-area football — look here. Of particular interest is the “Public League” (i.e., high school) segment, which features the largest helmet-borne uni number I’ve ever seen. ”¦ The English Premier League has a new lettering and numbering application guide (with thanks to longtime contributor Dominic Litten). ”¦ The Nationals were rained out on Sunday, so they did their Jackie Robinson routine last night. ”¦ So did the Giants. ”¦ The Sharks’ “WAS” memorial logo for deceased goalie coach Warren Arthur Strelow, which was originally worn as a helmet decal in Game 2 of their playoff series, has now been repurposed as a shoulder patch (additional views here and here). ”¦ John Romero notes that the Diamondbacks logo was missing from switch-hitter Albert Callaspo’s right-handed batting helmet on Saturday night (but his left-handed helmet was fine).

 
  
 
Comments (188)

    The tie thing is very interesting, I actually think it looks really classy on just about every single one of those various officials. It would be kind of cool to see referees and umpires get in to the whole “throwback” thing every once in awhile.

    I would love to get my hands on one of those NHL ref sweaters. They look completely righteous. I could see the NHL of ten years ago going back to those, but not the NHL of today…Which is sad.

    Go White Sox

    Do we have any conformation yet about yesterday’s Steeler comments and the possibility of an alternate/throwback uniform this season? Thanks.

    During last night’s Orioles game, the game announcers stated that the Jackie Robinson tribute that was washed out last weekend will be held during this Saturday’s game in Baltimore against the Blue Jays.

    Baltimore’s home game on Sunday against KC was rained out. Corey Patterson was expected to wear no. 42 for the birds.

    I haven’t seen any confirmation to this on the O’s website, nor did the broadcast mention any word about wether Patterson would be allowed to wear Robinson’s number during the festivities, at least not that I heard.

    Anyone hear anything about any of the other teams that were rained out this weekend?

    [quote comment=”71506″]The tie thing is very interesting, I actually think it looks really classy on just about every single one of those various officials. It would be kind of cool to see referees and umpires get in to the whole “throwback” thing every once in awhile.[/quote]

    Agreed! Like this:

    link

    This is off the topic of today’s post, but I’m looking for an image. It’s an image of the very first MLS soccer uniforms, and I’ve seen a link to it on this site before. Some guy with a website like kenn.com had a history of MLS kits, and among the images featured on his website was the one with all of the original kits on display. Does anyone know where else it might be posted online? Did anyone else happen to download it for themselves?

    Ken Griffey wears No. 3 in honour of his three children: George Kenneth III (“Trey”), daughter Taryn Kennedy, and adopted son Tevin Kendall.

    [quote comment=”71508″]Do we have any conformation yet about yesterday’s Steeler comments and the possibility of an alternate/throwback uniform this season? Thanks.[/quote]

    i don’t know that the steelers need a throwback as much as they need to lose that strange number font and go back to block numbers. those were some thick numbers and i thought they made the players look huge.

    I’ve never understood why the Prem doesn’t have any navy blue numbers… Spurs look ridiculous with the black numbers on the back of their white/navy shirts

    Sadly, I am wearing a tie. I envy all of you who work from home…

    Paul:

    Never thought an article about neckware could be interesting. Good job again.

    Any way you could do a day about the movie ‘Major League’. The “Wild Thing” edition was just released and they dug Rick Vaughn back up for the Dish commericals. What better time then now?

    While some may think the movie had some corny characters and sure it was filmed mostly at County Stadium – but no one can question the authenticity of baseball in 1989.

    The correct stirrups, the mullets,the equipment, the correct language (using “fuck” between every other word) and of course the uniforms. Rick Vaughn even used an A2000 glove that the pros would use rather than some lame low priced glove.

    The attention to detail alone could fill a day’s column. I’d like to see your take on the movie.

    I don’t know about anyone else, but I think those black D-Backs unis are pretty sweet. I’m usually not a big fan of black, but these are MUCH better than the red alts in my opinion.

    [quote comment=”71508″]Do we have any conformation yet about yesterday’s Steeler comments and the possibility of an alternate/throwback uniform this season? Thanks.[/quote]
    About a month ago here in Pittsburgh a radio station talked about the possibility of the Steelers wearing a Alt jersey that looks like their white jersey when it gets wet and looks almost silver, but I have not heard anything else since then

    I doubt this counts as a “sport” to most here, but I remember the WWE (then WWF) used to have their referees decked out in link and a Oxford-style short sleeve shirt. I’ve always been the fan of the Pro Wrestling Referee, while they technically don’t “referee”, they are invaluable to the company and the wrestlers in the ring.

    [quote comment=”71526″]I doubt this counts as a “sport” to most here, but I remember the WWE (then WWF) used to have their referees decked out in link and a Oxford-style short sleeve shirt. I’ve always been the fan of the Pro Wrestling Referee, while they technically don’t “referee”, they are invaluable to the company and the wrestlers in the ring.[/quote]

    I didn’t know Doublemint twins were refs back in rassling.

    Not uni related, but this is fantastic. There was a Patriots jacket involved, however.

    link

    Best if viewed with sound.

    [quote comment=”71527″][quote comment=”71526″]I doubt this counts as a “sport” to most here, but I remember the WWE (then WWF) used to have their referees decked out in link and a Oxford-style short sleeve shirt. I’ve always been the fan of the Pro Wrestling Referee, while they technically don’t “referee”, they are invaluable to the company and the wrestlers in the ring.[/quote]

    I didn’t know Doublemint twins were refs back in rassling.[/quote]

    Earl and Dave Hebner, actually… Quite the interesting story behind those two, and have link linkup at Wikipedia.

    [quote comment=”71527″][quote comment=”71526″]I doubt this counts as a “sport” to most here, but I remember the WWE (then WWF) used to have their referees decked out in link and a Oxford-style short sleeve shirt. I’ve always been the fan of the Pro Wrestling Referee, while they technically don’t “referee”, they are invaluable to the company and the wrestlers in the ring.[/quote]

    I didn’t know Doublemint twins were refs back in rassling.[/quote]

    IIRC, the Hebner twins were part of the storyline years ago when Hulk Hogan lost the title.
    Of course, one of the brothers is more notorious for being part of the non-storyline screwjob of Bret Hart about ten years ago.

    Paul, I think you got McVey’s league wrong. The first league was the National Association of Professional Base Ball Players which preceeded the National League and was around from 1871-75. The first American Association was founded in 1882.

    [quote comment=”71529″]Earl and Dave Hebner, actually… Quite the interesting story behind those two, and have link linkup at Wikipedia.[/quote]

    THAT brought back childhood memories. Wow. . .

    [quote comment=”71524″]Nice crowd at the rescheduled Jackie Robinson game in Washington.[/quote]
    ditto that

    he will never be just earl hebner…
    he will forever be referee earl hebner.
    its a title like dr. or rev.

    i will never be able to look at that guy, and NOT hear jim ross in my head saying, “referee earl hebner”. kinda like hearing him say “good ol fashioned oklahoma slobber knocker”.

    [quote comment=”71538″]Paul, I think you got McVey’s league wrong. The first league was the National Association of Professional Base Ball Players which preceeded the National League and was around from 1871-75. The first American Association was founded in 1882.[/quote]

    You’re right — my bad. I’ll fix it right now.

    [quote comment=”71520″]Sadly, I am wearing a tie. I envy all of you who work from home…[/quote]

    It’s not just the work-at-home crowd, but it’s also those of us in the Business Casual environments.

    I don’t mind dressing up. I like putting on a suit and tie, though I don’t much anymore.

    At my old law firm, we were supposed to have a “big client” visit. So we were told by one attorney to go from business casual to suits. So I put a suit on. The attorney whose firm it was, called me into his office and told me to take off my tie. I said that I understood, but I had it on now and liked it so I’d just leave it on. It was no big deal to me. He then became angry.

    (And people wonder why I started my own practice.)

    Here’s a link of a player in a bow tie and a very early uniform. The link identifies him as Ned Williamson, but it doesn’t look like link from Wikipedia. Williamson played for the Indianapolis Blues, Chicago White Stockings, and Chicago Pirates, so the big “A” on the bib doesn’t fit either. Cool picture either way.

    Regarding Albert Callaspo’s “helmet malfunction”… are there any switch-hitters wearing the double-earflap helmet these days? The last one I remember was link (shown here on a 1993 Upper Deck baseball card,) but he apparently went to link (shown on a 2004 Fleer card) before retiring.

    During the telecast of an exhibition game between the St. Louis Cardinals and their AAA affiliate, the Memphis Redbirds, I noticed that all the minor-leaguers used double-earflap helmets, whether they were switch-hitters or not!

    Mark Bellhorn wore the double-flap when he was with the Red Sox. Not too sure about last year with the Padres, though.

    [quote comment=”71547″][quote comment=”71520″]Sadly, I am wearing a tie. I envy all of you who work from home…[/quote]

    It’s not just the work-at-home crowd, but it’s also those of us in the Business Casual environments.[/quote]

    I don’t envy those of you in the business casual environments. I AM in a business casual environment. Unfortunately, I deal with clients who don’t have a business casual environment so I don’t always get to experience the joys of my own business casual environment.

    Yes, I know how many times I said “business casual environment” there. It was fun. And I am wearing a tie, dammit, so I am entitled to some freakin’ fun. OK?!

    lol

    [quote comment=”71550″]Regarding Albert Callaspo’s “helmet malfunction”… are there any switch-hitters wearing the double-earflap helmet these days? The last one I remember was link (shown here on a 1993 Upper Deck baseball card,) but he apparently went to link (shown on a 2004 Fleer card) before retiring.

    During the telecast of an exhibition game between the St. Louis Cardinals and their AAA affiliate, the Memphis Redbirds, I noticed that all the minor-leaguers used double-earflap helmets, whether they were switch-hitters or not![/quote]

    Shin-Soo Choo wears the double-earflap when the Indians call him up.

    Regarding Albert Callaspo’s “helmet malfunction”… are there any switch-hitters wearing the double-earflap helmet these days?

    Shane Victorino, I think.

    [quote comment=”71528″]Not uni related, but this is fantastic. There was a Patriots jacket involved, however.

    link

    Best if viewed with sound.[/quote]

    Hah, that’s great. I wish we had announcers like that in Seattle who would make that person the Fan of the Game. You would never see that here. They might show one reply, but not talk about it with the mindset that other fans are going to see it and imitate it.

    So I believe…

    [quote comment=”71547″][quote comment=”71520″]Sadly, I am wearing a tie. I envy all of you who work from home…[/quote]

    It’s not just the work-at-home crowd, but it’s also those of us in the Business Casual environments.[/quote]

    woo-hoo!

    [quote comment=”71552″][quote comment=”71547″][quote comment=”71520″]Sadly, I am wearing a tie. I envy all of you who work from home…[/quote]

    It’s not just the work-at-home crowd, but it’s also those of us in the Business Casual environments.[/quote]

    I don’t envy those of you in the business casual environments. I AM in a business casual environment. Unfortunately, I deal with clients who don’t have a business casual environment so I don’t always get to experience the joys of my own business casual environment.

    Yes, I know how many times I said “business casual environment” there. It was fun. And I am wearing a tie, dammit, so I am entitled to some freakin’ fun. OK?!

    lol[/quote]

    I think part of the reason my company doesn’t want to have us wear ties is because of our clients. Some of them might make us want to use our ties for link.

    [quote comment=”71554″]The vinatge base ball team I play for link.[/quote]

    Nice to see the Muffins on Uniwatch! visited you guys back in 1998 or so. as a (ex)-vintage ball player (Denver Blue Stockings) I agree the old ball club uniforms were always the best.

    As far as “business casual”, let’s just say that out west here no one at my office blinks if I show up wearing Mitchell and Ness White Sox jerseys to work! seeing how others wear shorts and sandals in the summer.

    huzzah for the National Game!

    [quote comment=”71550″]Regarding Albert Callaspo’s “helmet malfunction”… are there any switch-hitters wearing the double-earflap helmet these days? The last one I remember was link (shown here on a 1993 Upper Deck baseball card,) but he apparently went to link (shown on a 2004 Fleer card) before retiring.

    During the telecast of an exhibition game between the St. Louis Cardinals and their AAA affiliate, the Memphis Redbirds, I noticed that all the minor-leaguers used double-earflap helmets, whether they were switch-hitters or not![/quote]

    Orlando Hudson of the Diamondbacks is wearing a double flap helmet, I believe he did last year as well as in Toronto too, however there is picture of him at Toronto with a regular helmet.

    [quote comment=”71565″]In honor of link.[/quote]

    I picture El Rey sitting there since 8:30 waiting for 41 posts.

    [quote comment=”71566″]link

    Forgot to attach this to my last post, it just means he hasn’t worn double flap throughout his career.[/quote]
    [quote comment=”71571″]Way back when the BLUE Jays actually wore blue. :-([/quote]

    Yeah, but that jersey is still hideous.

    [quote comment=”71570″][quote comment=”71565″]In honor of link.[/quote]

    I picture El Rey sitting there since 8:30 waiting for 41 posts.[/quote]

    It’s funny, and I don’t even know if this would have been possible…but I was almost expecting all of the comment numbers on Sunday’s open thread to be “#42”.

    [quote comment=”71550″]Regarding Albert Callaspo’s “helmet malfunction”… are there any switch-hitters wearing the double-earflap helmet these days? The last one I remember was link (shown here on a 1993 Upper Deck baseball card,) but he apparently went to link (shown on a 2004 Fleer card) before retiring.

    During the telecast of an exhibition game between the St. Louis Cardinals and their AAA affiliate, the Memphis Redbirds, I noticed that all the minor-leaguers used double-earflap helmets, whether they were switch-hitters or not![/quote]

    link wore one for a while early last season although he only bats from the left side of the plate.

    I was at the Cubs/Padres game last night and I have to say, Jose Cruz Jr’s stirrups are even more impressive in person. I wish more players would go with that look.

    [quote comment=”71580″][quote comment=”71554″]The vinatge base ball team I play for link.[/quote]

    Is that the Jim Bouton league?[/quote]

    No. The Ohio Village Muffins play by 1860’s rules. No gloves, not spitting, underhand pitching.
    Bouton’s league plays 1880’s base ball.

    [quote comment=”71579″]link[/quote]

    Holy cow, is that the ugliest $200 baseball jersey ever offered for sale to the general public?

    There’s been ongoing discussion here in the past month of coaches, owners, etc being issued jerseys, though they never actually wear them.

    Here’s yet another example: link

    The Rockets are giving GM Carroll Dawson a jersey for the rafters of Toyota Center since he’s retiring after this year. Instead of a number, the jersey has ‘CD’.

    [quote comment=”71583″][quote comment=”71579″]link[/quote]

    Holy cow, is that the ugliest $200 baseball jersey ever offered for sale to the general public?[/quote]

    link

    [quote comment=”71550″]Regarding Albert Callaspo’s “helmet malfunction”… are there any switch-hitters wearing the double-earflap helmet these days? The last one I remember was link (shown here on a 1993 Upper Deck baseball card,) but he apparently went to link (shown on a 2004 Fleer card) before retiring.

    During the telecast of an exhibition game between the St. Louis Cardinals and their AAA affiliate, the Memphis Redbirds, I noticed that all the minor-leaguers used double-earflap helmets, whether they were switch-hitters or not![/quote]

    Almost all minor league baseball players are required to wear double flap helmets. Only major league baseball allows players to choose to wear a single flap batting helmet.

    [quote comment=”71570″][quote comment=”71565″]In honor of link.[/quote]

    I picture El Rey sitting there since 8:30 waiting for 41 posts.[/quote]

    Let’s just there wasn’t a lot of work being done!

    Royals pitcher Odalis Perez (seen link) appears to be link to a performance of Wicked in Dallas.

    Okay seriously, this is my auction. But this is only an excuse to share that picture of Odalis (date unknown).

    Last night while watching the Tigers/Royals game I noticed a KC player (Buck, I think) wearing some pretty nice stirrups. Alas, no one on the Tigers wears them–although Inge and Granderson wear tall socks. I pointed the stirrups out to my husband–who usually falls asleep during games, until I wake him up cheering my Tigers– said, “How do they get their pants to stay up over their knees?” Which made me do a double take because, like I said, he doesn’t usually pay attention. After seeing the baggy pants of some players, I started to wonder the same thing. Are the pants different for those who use stirrups, e.g are they cut shorter or differently? Never having seen a uniform up close (or worn one for that matter) how do they keep the pants up over their knees?

    [quote comment=”71592″]Royals pitcher Odalis Perez (seen link) appears to be link to a performance of Wicked in Dallas.

    Okay seriously, this is my auction. But this is only an excuse to share that picture of Odalis (date unknown).[/quote]

    Awesome eBay user name!

    Off-topic uni-related request: A friend purchased on EBay what was advertised as a game-used, recent University of Arizona softball jersey. The manufacturer is not one of the usual suspects, so to speak, though I forget its name. Can anyone confirm the manufacturer’s name or point me in a direction to do so myself? I’d lke to confirm whether the jersey my friend bought was made by the same manufacturer that made the U of A softball jerseys. Thanks.

    [quote comment=”71600″]Off-topic uni-related request: A friend purchased on EBay what was advertised as a game-used, recent University of Arizona softball jersey. The manufacturer is not one of the usual suspects, so to speak, though I forget its name. Can anyone confirm the manufacturer’s name or point me in a direction to do so myself? I’d lke to confirm whether the jersey my friend bought was made by the same manufacturer that made the U of A softball jerseys. Thanks.[/quote]
    I know that since the link it’s been Nike. Before that I want to say Champion like the baseball team. I’ll keep looking

    I got a message from the Twins online shop entitled, “A fitting tribute to #42”. I can buy link blah blah blah for $214.99. But wait! There’s more! I can also buy a Toriiiii Hunter replica with *cringe* his name on the back for link

    What a deal. The real price is only my soul and dignity.

    [quote comment=”71592″]Royals pitcher Odalis Perez (seen link) appears to be link to a performance of Wicked in Dallas.

    Okay seriously, this is my auction. But this is only an excuse to share that picture of Odalis (date unknown).[/quote]

    He seems as if he’d be more of a Renthead, really.

    0=)

    Oh, and, of course the jersey Hunter actually wore in the game did not have his name on it. Yes, MLB, this is a great way to honor Jackie Robinson.

    [quote comment=”71607″]I got a message from the Twins online shop entitled, “A fitting tribute to #42”. I can buy link blah blah blah for $214.99. But wait! There’s more! I can also buy a Toriiiii Hunter replica with *cringe* his name on the back for link

    What a deal. The real price is only my soul and dignity.[/quote]

    Back in 1997, I’m pretty sure Ken Griffey Jr. wore his name over the 42, and I was a little surprised that players didn’t have names on the backs for this tribute, especially in games where the entire teams were wearing 42. I can’t imagine what a difficulty that caused for official scorers and anyone trying to figure out who was warming up in a bullpen 300-500 feet away from where they were sitting. After all, the primary objective of names and numbers on jerseys is to provide identification. It’s not a complaint, because I thought it was classy all around, but I just found it a little odd.

    During the telecast of an exhibition game between the St. Louis Cardinals and their AAA affiliate, the Memphis Redbirds, I noticed that all the minor-leaguers used double-earflap helmets, whether they were switch-hitters or not![/quote]

    I believe all mino5r league players are required to wear double flap helmets, a la college HS etc.

    [quote comment=”71593″]Last night while watching the Tigers/Royals game I noticed a KC player (Buck, I think) wearing some pretty nice stirrups. Alas, no one on the Tigers wears them–although Inge and Granderson wear tall socks. I pointed the stirrups out to my husband–who usually falls asleep during games, until I wake him up cheering my Tigers– said, “How do they get their pants to stay up over their knees?” Which made me do a double take because, like I said, he doesn’t usually pay attention. After seeing the baggy pants of some players, I started to wonder the same thing. Are the pants different for those who use stirrups, e.g are they cut shorter or differently? Never having seen a uniform up close (or worn one for that matter) how do they keep the pants up over their knees?[/quote]

    Elastic at the cuffs

    This would have been a great excuse to link the YouTube clip of Conan O’Brien at the link game. However: “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by NBC Universal.”

    Whores.

    [quote comment=”71600″]Off-topic uni-related request: A friend purchased on EBay what was advertised as a game-used, recent University of Arizona softball jersey. The manufacturer is not one of the usual suspects, so to speak, though I forget its name. Can anyone confirm the manufacturer’s name or point me in a direction to do so myself? I’d lke to confirm whether the jersey my friend bought was made by the same manufacturer that made the U of A softball jerseys. Thanks.[/quote]

    you could just call U of A’s athletic department, im sure it would be a simple answer

    [quote comment=”71603″][quote comment=”71600″]Off-topic uni-related request: A friend purchased on EBay what was advertised as a game-used, recent University of Arizona softball jersey. The manufacturer is not one of the usual suspects, so to speak, though I forget its name. Can anyone confirm the manufacturer’s name or point me in a direction to do so myself? I’d lke to confirm whether the jersey my friend bought was made by the same manufacturer that made the U of A softball jerseys. Thanks.[/quote]
    I know that since the link it’s been Nike. Before that I want to say Champion like the baseball team. I’ll keep looking[/quote]

    Thanks for your help. The jersey purchased was not a Nike (nor a Champion), but a company that I’ve never heard of. I presume, then, that it’s a replica jersey. But were U of A softball jersey replicas even made/sold? BTW, this jersey is the blue one with the white script “Arizona”.

    [quote comment=”71618″][quote comment=”71600″]Off-topic uni-related request: A friend purchased on EBay what was advertised as a game-used, recent University of Arizona softball jersey. The manufacturer is not one of the usual suspects, so to speak, though I forget its name. Can anyone confirm the manufacturer’s name or point me in a direction to do so myself? I’d lke to confirm whether the jersey my friend bought was made by the same manufacturer that made the U of A softball jerseys. Thanks.[/quote]

    you could just call U of A’s athletic department, im sure it would be a simple answer[/quote]
    but not as fun. anyway, pre-Finch it’s link.

    [quote comment=”71620″][quote comment=”71603″][quote comment=”71600″]Off-topic uni-related request: A friend purchased on EBay what was advertised as a game-used, recent University of Arizona softball jersey. The manufacturer is not one of the usual suspects, so to speak, though I forget its name. Can anyone confirm the manufacturer’s name or point me in a direction to do so myself? I’d lke to confirm whether the jersey my friend bought was made by the same manufacturer that made the U of A softball jerseys. Thanks.[/quote]
    I know that since the link it’s been Nike. Before that I want to say Champion like the baseball team. I’ll keep looking[/quote]

    Thanks for your help. The jersey purchased was not a Nike (nor a Champion), but a company that I’ve never heard of. I presume, then, that it’s a replica jersey. But were U of A softball jersey replicas even made/sold? BTW, this jersey is the blue one with the white script “Arizona”.[/quote]
    I’ve never seen a jersey sold, but I’ve never looked for one either.
    In my search I ran across link that Minna will like.

    I can’t be totally positive, but I think that photo of the massive football helmet number is bizarre for another reason.

    I am 99% sure that is from the brief period of time (under Joe Kuharich, I believe) that Notre Dame wore a logo, in this case a shamrock, on their helmet.

    [quote comment=”71589″][quote comment=”71570″][quote comment=”71565″]In honor of link.[/quote]

    I picture El Rey sitting there since 8:30 waiting for 41 posts.[/quote]

    Let’s just there wasn’t a lot of work being done![/quote]

    It would have been funny if someone else slid a post in before yours. Ok, I would have found it funny.

    does anyone else think the cleats on the first picture of the ballplayer in paul’s story look REALLY modern?

    [quote comment=”71542″][quote comment=”71524″]Nice crowd at the rescheduled Jackie Robinson game in Washington.[/quote]
    ditto that[/quote]

    Monday’s game at RFK was not a rescheduled game. On Sunday the Nats were in NY to play the Mets (or, as it turned out, watch a lot of crappy weather in NYC).

    The Nats had scheduled Monday as a home tribute to #42…..where it seems that dozens of folks turned out in equally bad weather.

    On the topic of players’ reasons for choosing their uniform numbers:

    Sports Illustrated runs an occasional feature called “Me And My Number” or something like that, but I don’t think it’s archived online.

    Off the top of my head, I know link and link wear #20 — an unusual number for goalies — in honor of link, the legendary former Red Army Team goalie who coached Belfour in Chicago (and who, of note, was inexplicably benched for the third period of the “Miracle On Ice” game).

    Also, I think link wears #23 in honor of link, his favorite baseball player growing up.

    [quote comment=”71613″]Indeed, link of Griffey’s name/42 combo from 1997:[/quote]

    Wow. That looks…wrong (not the socks of course). I thought it excellent not to have the names on the back, but I did wonder how it would affect the scoring and such for the teams with all #42s.

    Ok. I know one of you will know the answer to this. I am sure there are teams during the tribute games that had names on the back of their jerseys. Or were there? If there were, did they just leave the #42 jersey blank? Thanks for your help.

    [quote comment=”71547″][quote comment=”71520″]Sadly, I am wearing a tie. I envy all of you who work from home…[/quote]

    It’s not just the work-at-home crowd, but it’s also those of us in the Business Casual environments.[/quote]

    And, of course, the women of the board who are (most likely) not wearing ties. Unless Diane Keaton is a UniWatch enthusiast, in which case I beg her pardon.

    We do not get off easy, though. I would put pantyhose above ties as far as uncomfortable attire, especially when paired with high heels. I had a meeting this morning, so now I will be suffering until I get out of here at 5.

    A Smog reference during my sports roundup? Only at Uniwatch. Brilliant. I think “I am a dink” might also become the official statement of ballplayers in this day and age wearing their pants like pajamas.

    [quote comment=”71636″][quote comment=”71613″]Indeed, link of Griffey’s name/42 combo from 1997:[/quote]

    Wow. That looks…wrong (not the socks of course). I thought it excellent not to have the names on the back, but I did wonder how it would affect the scoring and such for the teams with all #42s.

    Ok. I know one of you will know the answer to this. I am sure there are teams during the tribute games that had names on the back of their jerseys. Or were there? If there were, did they just leave the #42 jersey blank? Thanks for your help.[/quote]

    All players that wore a #42 jersey, regardless of what team they’re on, did not have a name on the back.

    suppose the yankees were a team who had their last names on their jerseys.
    i wonder, would mariano rivera have had his last on his jersey on sunday or not?

    [quote comment=”71625″]Isn’t it interesting that in 97 Griffey goes link but in 2007 he stays link????

    Come on man!!![/quote]
    [quote comment=”71641″]A Smog reference during my sports roundup? Only at Uniwatch. Brilliant. I think “I am a dink” might also become the official statement of ballplayers in this day and age wearing their pants like pajamas.[/quote]

    Why do people always say the long pants look like pajama pants?
    Griffey’s pants don’t look like any pajama pants I’ve ever seen. They just look like regular ordinary pants, being worn as part of a uniform.

    [quote comment=”71616″]This would have been a great excuse to link the YouTube clip of Conan O’Brien at the link game. However: “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by NBC Universal.”

    Whores.[/quote]

    Don’t you worry Philly Bill, I got you covered right link

    [quote comment=”71643″]suppose the yankees were a team who had their last names on their jerseys.
    i wonder, would mariano rivera have had his last on his jersey on sunday or not?[/quote]

    What if a player’s last name was Robinson?

    [quote comment=”71640″][quote comment=”71547″][quote comment=”71520″]Sadly, I am wearing a tie. I envy all of you who work from home…[/quote]

    It’s not just the work-at-home crowd, but it’s also those of us in the Business Casual environments.[/quote]

    And, of course, the women of the board who are (most likely) not wearing ties. Unless Diane Keaton is a UniWatch enthusiast, in which case I beg her pardon.

    We do not get off easy, though. I would put pantyhose above ties as far as uncomfortable attire, especially when paired with high heels. I had a meeting this morning, so now I will be suffering until I get out of here at 5.[/quote]

    High heels????? Pantyhose????? What are these garments of which you speak? Me, I am wearing velvet pants, a nice in-between winter/spring top, and flats. All black, of course. I brought a jacket with me, but left it in the car.

    tessa, my feet feel your pain. Ouch!

    [quote comment=”71646″][quote comment=”71616″]This would have been a great excuse to link the YouTube clip of Conan O’Brien at the link game. However: “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by NBC Universal.”

    Whores.[/quote]

    Don’t you worry Philly Bill, I got you covered right link[/quote]

    Sorry for the small size, link

    Was at two Blue Jays games this weekend – seems the new T cap has become their primary cap. While I didn’t like it at first, it is an improvement over the oversized J with bird. I even bought one – anyone else finding that the new caps are an 1/8 bigger than the old wool ones?

    [quote comment=”71642″][quote comment=”71636″][quote comment=”71613″]Indeed, link of Griffey’s name/42 combo from 1997:[/quote]

    Wow. That looks…wrong (not the socks of course). I thought it excellent not to have the names on the back, but I did wonder how it would affect the scoring and such for the teams with all #42s.

    Ok. I know one of you will know the answer to this. I am sure there are teams during the tribute games that had names on the back of their jerseys. Or were there? If there were, did they just leave the #42 jersey blank? Thanks for your help.[/quote]

    All players that wore a #42 jersey, regardless of what team they’re on, did not have a name on the back.[/quote]

    Yeah, I got that. I guess my question would have been better asked, did any teams have their names on the back of their jerseys during those games? I think it would have been odd to have one person without a blank jersey and everyone else with a name.

    [quote comment=”71650″][quote comment=”71646″][quote comment=”71616″]This would have been a great excuse to link the YouTube clip of Conan O’Brien at the link game. However: “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by NBC Universal.”

    Whores.[/quote]

    Don’t you worry Philly Bill, I got you covered right link[/quote]

    Sorry for the small size, link[/quote]

    Nice find! One of the funniest thing’s Conan’s ever done.

    Forgot to mention that Bill (Smog) Callahan is reportedly the significant other of keening-voiced harpist link. She has a link coming out next week.

    [quote comment=”71645″][quote comment=”71625″]Isn’t it interesting that in 97 Griffey goes link but in 2007 he stays link????

    Come on man!!![/quote]
    [quote comment=”71641″]A Smog reference during my sports roundup? Only at Uniwatch. Brilliant. I think “I am a dink” might also become the official statement of ballplayers in this day and age wearing their pants like pajamas.[/quote]

    Why do people always say the long pants look like pajama pants?
    Griffey’s pants don’t look like any pajama pants I’ve ever seen. They just look like regular ordinary pants, being worn as part of a uniform.[/quote]

    I think it’s the comfort factor. You know, you’re all snug and comfy in pajamas–those pants look like you could sleep in them. I wouldn’t know–I don’t think I’ve ever worn pajamas with pants.

    [quote comment=”71652″][quote comment=”71642″][quote comment=”71636″][quote comment=”71613″]Indeed, link of Griffey’s name/42 combo from 1997:[/quote]

    Wow. That looks…wrong (not the socks of course). I thought it excellent not to have the names on the back, but I did wonder how it would affect the scoring and such for the teams with all #42s.

    Ok. I know one of you will know the answer to this. I am sure there are teams during the tribute games that had names on the back of their jerseys. Or were there? If there were, did they just leave the #42 jersey blank? Thanks for your help.[/quote]

    All players that wore a #42 jersey, regardless of what team they’re on, did not have a name on the back.[/quote]

    Yeah, I got that. I guess my question would have been better asked, did any teams have their names on the back of their jerseys during those games? I think it would have been odd to have one person without a blank jersey and everyone else with a name.[/quote]

    Anyone with a “42” on their back had no name. While “weird” is a term you could use, I thought it was distinctive and stood out in a way to make people wonder about the reason for it.

    [quote comment=”71655″][quote comment=”71645″][quote comment=”71625″]Isn’t it interesting that in 97 Griffey goes link but in 2007 he stays link????

    Come on man!!![/quote]
    [quote comment=”71641″]A Smog reference during my sports roundup? Only at Uniwatch. Brilliant. I think “I am a dink” might also become the official statement of ballplayers in this day and age wearing their pants like pajamas.[/quote]

    Why do people always say the long pants look like pajama pants?
    Griffey’s pants don’t look like any pajama pants I’ve ever seen. They just look like regular ordinary pants, being worn as part of a uniform.[/quote]

    I think it’s the comfort factor. You know, you’re all snug and comfy in pajamas–those pants look like you could sleep in them. I wouldn’t know–I don’t think I’ve ever worn pajamas with pants.[/quote]

    Even when high socks and/or stirrups started disappearing from baseball, the longer pants were still usually tapered with elastic cuffs. The trend now seems to be that the cuffs and hang loose, often over the shoes even, much like a pair of pajama pants would. (At least that’s the way I always saw it).

    [quote comment=”71655″]I think it’s the comfort factor. You know, you’re all snug and comfy in pajamas–those pants look like you could sleep in them. I wouldn’t know–I don’t think I’ve ever worn pajamas with pants.[/quote]

    I mean. . . it has only been since I was 10 or 11, I think, since I last wore pajama pants. I agree – baseball pants don’t look like p.j.s. My mom and a friend from England would disagree, however.

    [quote comment=”71616″]This would have been a great excuse to link the YouTube clip of Conan O’Brien at the link game. However: “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by NBC Universal.”

    Whores.[/quote]

    You mean link?

    [quote comment=”71645″][quote comment=”71625″]Isn’t it interesting that in 97 Griffey goes link but in 2007 he stays link????

    Come on man!!![/quote]
    [quote comment=”71641″]A Smog reference during my sports roundup? Only at Uniwatch. Brilliant. I think “I am a dink” might also become the official statement of ballplayers in this day and age wearing their pants like pajamas.[/quote]

    Why do people always say the long pants look like pajama pants?
    Griffey’s pants don’t look like any pajama pants I’ve ever seen. They just look like regular ordinary pants, being worn as part of a uniform.[/quote]

    If Manny had his way, these would be the pants worn by the Red Sox. They would fit about like those that he wears now.

    link

    [quote comment=”71657″][quote comment=”71652″][quote comment=”71642″][quote comment=”71636″][quote comment=”71613″]Indeed, link of Griffey’s name/42 combo from 1997:[/quote]

    Wow. That looks…wrong (not the socks of course). I thought it excellent not to have the names on the back, but I did wonder how it would affect the scoring and such for the teams with all #42s.

    Ok. I know one of you will know the answer to this. I am sure there are teams during the tribute games that had names on the back of their jerseys. Or were there? If there were, did they just leave the #42 jersey blank? Thanks for your help.[/quote]

    All players that wore a #42 jersey, regardless of what team they’re on, did not have a name on the back.[/quote]

    Yeah, I got that. I guess my question would have been better asked, did any teams have their names on the back of their jerseys during those games? I think it would have been odd to have one person without a blank jersey and everyone else with a name.[/quote]

    Anyone with a “42” on their back had no name. While “weird” is a term you could use, I thought it was distinctive and stood out in a way to make people wonder about the reason for it.[/quote]

    I understand that. I am wondering if there were teams with names on their backs at all. THAT is my main question. I don’t have cable, and I only watched the Twins game–I don’t even remember if the Devil Rays had names on the back of their jerseys.

    I agree it is a good thing not to have names, and I still think it’s werid. The two are not mutually exclusive.

    folks, maybe you can help me out…
    im trying to put together a folder of bookmarks for team merchandise stores…
    not the high end stuff you can get off of nfl, mlb, or nba.com, but the good stuff like the red sox have here
    link

    i know a lot of you have looked at fitzy’s townie news site, and you’ll find that his sponsors sell cool fan stuff as well as seen here
    link
    link
    link

    since you folks are spread out nationally and you have your favorite teams, i figured you might know the underground online places to shop for team gear.

    just respond with team name and online store address…
    thanks.

    krvanch

    I just noticed a link on sale for the LA Galaxy on the MLS Store.

    It replaces the normal linkwith Yellow and Blue. Could this be the future colors/rebranding of the Galaxy?

    [quote comment=”71671″]folks, maybe you can help me out…
    im trying to put together a folder of bookmarks for team merchandise stores…
    not the high end stuff you can get off of nfl, mlb, or nba.com, but the good stuff like the red sox have here
    link

    i know a lot of you have looked at fitzy’s townie news site, and you’ll find that his sponsors sell cool fan stuff as well as seen here
    link
    link
    link

    since you folks are spread out nationally and you have your favorite teams, i figured you might know the underground online places to shop for team gear.

    just respond with team name and online store address…
    thanks.

    krvanch[/quote]

    What an awesome idea…this list must be shared!

    [quote comment=”71669″][quote comment=”71657″][quote comment=”71652″][quote comment=”71642″][quote comment=”71636″][quote comment=”71613″]Indeed, link of Griffey’s name/42 combo from 1997:[/quote]

    Wow. That looks…wrong (not the socks of course). I thought it excellent not to have the names on the back, but I did wonder how it would affect the scoring and such for the teams with all #42s.

    Ok. I know one of you will know the answer to this. I am sure there are teams during the tribute games that had names on the back of their jerseys. Or were there? If there were, did they just leave the #42 jersey blank? Thanks for your help.[/quote]

    All players that wore a #42 jersey, regardless of what team they’re on, did not have a name on the back.[/quote]

    Yeah, I got that. I guess my question would have been better asked, did any teams have their names on the back of their jerseys during those games? I think it would have been odd to have one person without a blank jersey and everyone else with a name.[/quote]

    Anyone with a “42” on their back had no name. While “weird” is a term you could use, I thought it was distinctive and stood out in a way to make people wonder about the reason for it.[/quote]

    I understand that. I am wondering if there were teams with names on their backs at all. THAT is my main question. I don’t have cable, and I only watched the Twins game–I don’t even remember if the Devil Rays had names on the back of their jerseys.

    I agree it is a good thing not to have names, and I still think it’s werid. The two are not mutually exclusive.[/quote]

    All other jersey’s were normal. Uni’s that normally have names on were left with them on, and uni’s that traditionally don’t have names on their uni’s were not on.

    [quote comment=”71676″][quote comment=”71671″]folks, maybe you can help me out…
    im trying to put together a folder of bookmarks for team merchandise stores…
    not the high end stuff you can get off of nfl, mlb, or nba.com, but the good stuff like the red sox have here
    link

    i know a lot of you have looked at fitzy’s townie news site, and you’ll find that his sponsors sell cool fan stuff as well as seen here
    link
    link
    link

    since you folks are spread out nationally and you have your favorite teams, i figured you might know the underground online places to shop for team gear.

    just respond with team name and online store address…
    thanks.

    krvanch[/quote]

    What an awesome idea…this list must be shared![/quote]

    perhaps paul could set up a uniwatch merchandise email address where readers could send in the underground merchandise site links on an ongoing basis. that way all the links will be organized together rather than spread out over a few days on the blog. we do have an intern, perhaps he could handle that?

    i know jerry stackhouse wears 42 to honor jackie adn paul cna u post the list in an article

    I heard on tv that the Pirates Robinson Tribute will be either made up on the 60th anniversary of the day he played his first game in Pittsburgh or when they play the Dodgers.

    [quote comment=”71672″]I just noticed a link on sale for the LA Galaxy on the MLS Store.

    It replaces the normal linkwith Yellow and Blue. Could this be the future colors/rebranding of the Galaxy?[/quote]

    Likely not. It’s a 2006 jersey, and they wore it for some occasion as a one off deal.

    [quote comment=”71650″][quote comment=”71646″][quote comment=”71616″]This would have been a great excuse to link the YouTube clip of Conan O’Brien at the link game. However: “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by NBC Universal.”

    Whores.[/quote]

    Don’t you worry Philly Bill, I got you covered right link[/quote]

    Sorry for the small size, link[/quote]

    That’s what she said. *snicker*

    I noticed that the second baseman for the d-rays and the center fielder for the rockies had some nice stirrups last nite.

    And I have also noticed that quite a few of the mets are wearing the wool hats rather than the new ones. One of the coaches is even wearing a older one.

    Might be time for Paul to find out if they have a reason for this?

    [quote comment=”71691″]I noticed that the second baseman for the d-rays and the center fielder for the rockies had some nice stirrups last nite.

    And I have also noticed that quite a few of the mets are wearing the wool hats rather than the new ones. One of the coaches is even wearing a older one.

    Might be time for Paul to find out if they have a reason for this?[/quote]
    Sound’s like the got the “Ditch the Black” memo and misunderstood what black Paul was referring to.

    Dear Omar,
    What Paul meant was Black uni tops and hats with black on the OUTSIDE not the ones under the brim.
    Love, Shaftman

    link

    Anthony Reyes wearin’ ’em right last night! (pic no actually from last night, but it’s the best I can do)

    So Jose Cruz Jr. is not wearing his trademark stirrups today. He didn’t start, so that could be the reason, but when he came up to pinch hit… pajama pants.

    [quote comment=”71671″]folks, maybe you can help me out…
    im trying to put together a folder of bookmarks for team merchandise stores…
    not the high end stuff you can get off of nfl, mlb, or nba.com, but the good stuff like the red sox have here
    link

    i know a lot of you have looked at fitzy’s townie news site, and you’ll find that his sponsors sell cool fan stuff as well as seen here
    link
    link
    link

    since you folks are spread out nationally and you have your favorite teams, i figured you might know the underground online places to shop for team gear.

    just respond with team name and online store address…
    thanks.

    krvanch[/quote]

    For Seattle, the Seattle Team Shop is a good place. link

    [quote comment=”71693″]link

    looked sharp last night……..his uni, not his pitching.[/quote]

    He needs to baggy-up those pants some though.

    One of my greatest Uni Fears is that a baseball player will decide to adopt the NFL Bikers Shorts pants look, and the overly tight, hiked up pants worn by Reyes are a step in that direction.

    [quote comment=”71649″][quote comment=”71640″][quote comment=”71547″][quote comment=”71520″]Sadly, I am wearing a tie. I envy all of you who work from home…[/quote]

    It’s not just the work-at-home crowd, but it’s also those of us in the Business Casual environments.[/quote]

    And, of course, the women of the board who are (most likely) not wearing ties. Unless Diane Keaton is a UniWatch enthusiast, in which case I beg her pardon.

    We do not get off easy, though. I would put pantyhose above ties as far as uncomfortable attire, especially when paired with high heels. I had a meeting this morning, so now I will be suffering until I get out of here at 5.[/quote]

    High heels????? Pantyhose????? What are these garments of which you speak? Me, I am wearing velvet pants, a nice in-between winter/spring top, and flats. All black, of course. I brought a jacket with me, but left it in the car.

    tessa, my feet feel your pain. Ouch![/quote]

    As for both of you…I’m enjoying the day in blue jeans, a casual long sleeve shirt and sandles…I love working where I work. And I agree with Minna…tessa, my feet feel your pain.

    Utility man Rene Gonzales wore number 88 with the Baltimore Orioles in the early 90s as number 8 was already taken by Cal Ripken.

    PS. I hope I submitted this little piece of info fast enough to beat any lame anecdotes about Eric Lindros or Michael Irvin.

    Interesting to note also that in the Cubs game David Arquette through out the first pitch wearing a replica jersey with the number 420.

    [quote comment=”71512″]This is off the topic of today’s post, but I’m looking for an image. It’s an image of the very first MLS soccer uniforms, and I’ve seen a link to it on this site before. Some guy with a website like kenn.com had a history of MLS kits, and among the images featured on his website was the one with all of the original kits on display. Does anyone know where else it might be posted online? Did anyone else happen to download it for themselves?[/quote]

    web.archive.org is your friend in this instance:

    link

    [quote comment=”71709″]

    web.archive.org is your friend in this instance:

    link

    Thanks a million, man!

    i know i asked this late last night, but i seem to have forgotten the link to the worst soccer kits ever… if anyone could help me out it would be much appreciated

    [quote comment=”71636″][quote comment=”71613″]Indeed, link of Griffey’s name/42 combo from 1997:[/quote]

    Wow. That looks…wrong (not the socks of course). I thought it excellent not to have the names on the back, but I did wonder how it would affect the scoring and such for the teams with all #42s.

    Ok. I know one of you will know the answer to this. I am sure there are teams during the tribute games that had names on the back of their jerseys. Or were there? If there were, did they just leave the #42 jersey blank? Thanks for your help.[/quote]

    all 42’s were blank regardless of the rest of hte team, look at the chicago shot of Lee for an example. Now I cant tell you if the guy who still wears 42 normally had his name off for the game or not.

    I’m going to have to disagree with most of you on wearing ties and other formal/business attire. Here in Japan most people dress well every day — button-down dress shirts and ties for the guys, skirts, tights, and high heels for women (but tall boots in winter; trust me, guys, you’ll like this).

    I myself avoid wearing a necktie on the train to work (summer heat + cinched tie + chest hair = lots of sweat), but then I put it on once I get to the air-conditioned office. Women who dislike high-heeled shoes will keep a pair of slippers under their desks and change into them when they get to work.

    The suits worn by college graduates or other young people interviewing for work are virtual uniforms in that their color and details are so regimented. Dark blue is the rule. Here’s link, here’s link, and here’s a close-up of the link.

    At first I didn’t like the hassle of ties and ironed shirts but now I like seeing other people look good and putting in the effort myself. I wish some of this casual class would come back to the US!

    [quote comment=”71510″]During last night’s Orioles game, the game announcers stated that the Jackie Robinson tribute that was washed out last weekend will be held during this Saturday’s game in Baltimore against the Blue Jays.

    Baltimore’s home game on Sunday against KC was rained out. Corey Patterson was expected to wear no. 42 for the birds.

    I haven’t seen any confirmation to this on the O’s website, nor did the broadcast mention any word about wether Patterson would be allowed to wear Robinson’s number during the festivities, at least not that I heard.

    Anyone hear anything about any of the other teams that were rained out this weekend?[/quote]

    Last night’s Giants-Rockies game featured five Giants wearing 42: Barry Bonds, Ray Durham, Randy Winn, Dave Roberts, and first base coach Willie Upshaw.

    [quote comment=”71719″] I wish some of this casual class would come back to the US![/quote]

    Agreed. Personally, I’m awaiting a job offer at a new company that requires full business suit every day. At my current job, it’s business casual, which could be as basic as Gap khakis and a polo shirt. Sometimes it can look really dumpy. Here’s to bringing back the classiness!

    [quote comment=”71728″][quote comment=”71719″] I wish some of this casual class would come back to the US![/quote]

    Agreed. Personally, I’m awaiting a job offer at a new company that requires full business suit every day. At my current job, it’s business casual, which could be as basic as Gap khakis and a polo shirt. Sometimes it can look really dumpy. Here’s to bringing back the classiness![/quote]

    When I first moved to NYC, I had a job interview at a firm where it was very casual. I wore a suit and stuck out. The attorney who interviewed me wore faded jeans and a bad shirt. I met an associate and she wore a shirt that looked like it came out of the hamper that morning (wrinkled all over). They didn’t seem serious to me. (How did they depositions at that office?) Awful. Just awful.

    I’ve been watching the D-Rays all season and Ben Zobrist wears his pants high with low stirrups for all home games and low pants around the ankle for all road games. Sorry no pics, you’ll just have to trust me on this one.

    Well as a Pirate fan the embarrassment of 14 years of losing isn’t enough… they make the awful red uni… and the news is getting worse…. the fashion has leaked to other link….

    [quote comment=”71685″][quote comment=”71672″]I just noticed a link on sale for the LA Galaxy on the MLS Store.

    It replaces the normal linkwith Yellow and Blue. Could this be the future colors/rebranding of the Galaxy?[/quote]

    Likely not. It’s a 2006 jersey, and they wore it for some occasion as a one off deal.[/quote]

    But did they wear that jersey last season? I don’t remember it…but then again, I don’t follow the Galaxy that closely.

    [quote comment=”71707″]Interesting to note also that in the Cubs game David Arquette through out the first pitch wearing a replica jersey with the number 420.[/quote]

    Yeah, he has a new movie out about stoners on friday(4/20). He came to the annual Hash Bash here in Ann Arbor to promote it as well. He handed out rolling papers and lighters. It was kinda funny.

    Freddy Garcia who is pitching for the Phillies against the Mets today just got made to change his glove. This was before the game started. Willie Randolph, the Mets manager made a comment to the Umpires and they made Garcia change it. It was a red and black 2 tone. He now is using an all black one.

    Uni related note from the Phillies game tonight.

    After throwing his warm-up pitches before the start, Freddie Garcia was made to change his two-tone red/black glove to a solid black. The change appeared to have been made after Willie Randolph complained to the umps.

    No pics as of yet…

    [quote comment=”71530″][quote comment=”71527″][quote comment=”71526″]I doubt this counts as a “sport” to most here, but I remember the WWE (then WWF) used to have their referees decked out in link and a Oxford-style short sleeve shirt. I’ve always been the fan of the Pro Wrestling Referee, while they technically don’t “referee”, they are invaluable to the company and the wrestlers in the ring.[/quote]

    I didn’t know Doublemint twins were refs back in rassling.[/quote]

    IIRC, the Hebner twins were part of the storyline years ago when Hulk Hogan lost the title.
    Of course, one of the brothers is more notorious for being part of the non-storyline screwjob of Bret Hart about ten years ago.[/quote]

    Talking wrestling on uniwatch!?! I like this!!! My two favorite subjects: pro wrestling adn uniforms! Bring back the ECW from 10 years ago!!! Triple Threat!!!

    Watching the Braves-Nationals game. The Nats are wearing Virginia Tech hats in response to yesterday’s tragedy.

    The Washington Nationals are wearing Virginia Tech caps tonight against the Braves… it’s a mix-and-match job, but a nice tribute.

    Not only are the Nats wearing Va Tech caps, but they were donated by Sports Authority. The only problem is that Modell’s is their official sporting goods retail store. Oops.

    The Yankees have FINALLY put Jackie Robinson’s #42 in Monument Park. Sure, it took them 10 years, but I bet they were waiting for Mariano.

    I believe that David Ortiz wears 34 as a tribute to Kirby Puckett. I’m not sure, but he didn’t wear the number in Minnesota (obviously) and switched to it with Boston pretty quickly. He also wrote 34 on his hat in spring training last year after Kirby died.

    Interesting side note to the Nats wearing Tech caps: Ryan Zimmerman is a Virginia alum. Wonder what his buddies will think of that.

    [quote comment=”71719″]I’m going to have to disagree with most of you on wearing ties and other formal/business attire. Here in Japan most people dress well every day — button-down dress shirts and ties for the guys, skirts, tights, and high heels for women (but tall boots in winter; trust me, guys, you’ll like this).

    I myself avoid wearing a necktie on the train to work (summer heat + cinched tie + chest hair = lots of sweat), but then I put it on once I get to the air-conditioned office. Women who dislike high-heeled shoes will keep a pair of slippers under their desks and change into them when they get to work.

    The suits worn by college graduates or other young people interviewing for work are virtual uniforms in that their color and details are so regimented. Dark blue is the rule. Here’s link, here’s link, and here’s a close-up of the link.

    At first I didn’t like the hassle of ties and ironed shirts but now I like seeing other people look good and putting in the effort myself. I wish some of this casual class would come back to the US![/quote]

    I remember my mom dressing that way when I was growing up in Houston. (Mom worked in commerial real-estate for oil companies) I remember how nice she always looked. I can’t imagine someone doing that kind of job without dressing to impress.

    I work for an international bank and the dress code varies by function and rank. We computer geeks have a business casual environment. However, our VP is never seen without a suit and tie on. He rarely makes it down from NYC though. Casual clothing in the workplace has become too casual, but I don’t think I would accept a position that required me to power dress every day. A guy in a well-made and fitted suit and tie usually looks very good though.

    [quote comment=”71620″][quote comment=”71603″][quote comment=”71600″]Off-topic uni-related request: A friend purchased on EBay what was advertised as a game-used, recent University of Arizona softball jersey. The manufacturer is not one of the usual suspects, so to speak, though I forget its name. Can anyone confirm the manufacturer’s name or point me in a direction to do so myself? I’d lke to confirm whether the jersey my friend bought was made by the same manufacturer that made the U of A softball jerseys. Thanks.[/quote]
    I know that since the link it’s been Nike. Before that I want to say Champion like the baseball team. I’ll keep looking[/quote]

    Thanks for your help. The jersey purchased was not a Nike (nor a Champion), but a company that I’ve never heard of. I presume, then, that it’s a replica jersey. But were U of A softball jersey replicas even made/sold? BTW, this jersey is the blue one with the white script “Arizona”.[/quote]

    You can buy Arizona replica jerseys at the link below. (wouldn’t let me link it) I have not found any authentic jerseys available for any softball team anywhere.

    link

    [quote comment=”71718″][quote comment=”71636″][quote comment=”71613″]Indeed, link of Griffey’s name/42 combo from 1997:[/quote]

    Wow. That looks…wrong (not the socks of course). I thought it excellent not to have the names on the back, but I did wonder how it would affect the scoring and such for the teams with all #42s.

    Ok. I know one of you will know the answer to this. I am sure there are teams during the tribute games that had names on the back of their jerseys. Or were there? If there were, did they just leave the #42 jersey blank? Thanks for your help.[/quote]

    all 42’s were blank regardless of the rest of hte team, look at the chicago shot of Lee for an example. Now I cant tell you if the guy who still wears 42 normally had his name off for the game or not.[/quote]

    I’m not sure if you were being serious about your last comment or not, but the only MLB player that still wears #42 is Mariano Rivera, and the Yankees never have their names on the backs of their home or away jerseys, so to put this to bed, no player was wearing a #42 jersey with a name on the back on Jackie Robinson tribute day.

    [quote comment=”71651″]Was at two Blue Jays games this weekend – seems the new T cap has become their primary cap. While I didn’t like it at first, it is an improvement over the oversized J with bird. I even bought one – anyone else finding that the new caps are an 1/8 bigger than the old wool ones?[/quote]

    Blue Jays wore their link today in a game against the Red Sox. Also, I couldn’t find a picture, but I believe that the N on Kyle Snyder’s jersey was backwards today, but that could’ve just been my eyes playing a trick on me.

    [quote comment=”71761″]Watching the Braves-Nationals game. The Nats are wearing Virginia Tech hats in response to yesterday’s tragedy.[/quote]

    Right link

    Nice touch by the Nats with the VT hats. Have teams done a moment of silence? What a sad story.

    interesting uni-related note from tonight’s red sox game – dice-k started the game with link under his jersey, but switched to link before he came out for the 5th inning

    My two favorite uniform number ‘honors:’

    Bill Voiselle, Boston Braves and New York Giants pitcher in the ;40s wore 96 to honor his hometown, Ninety-Six, South Carolina.

    Carlos May, the White Sox outfielder, wore 17 to honor…his birthday… MAY 17.

    Off the top of my head for the numbers list
    #25, nick anderson for hte orlando magicv in honor of his friend who was shot
    #43 brad daugherty wore this in honor of his favorite nascar driver, (the name escapes me)
    #23, MJ wore this because his brother was 45, he wanted to be half as good as his brother…
    #66 lemeuix wore this because he always wore gretzkys 99, but his agent encouraged him to make his own number so he turned the 99 upside down

    i’ll be back with more later

    [quote comment=”71827″]Off the top of my head for the numbers list
    #25, nick anderson for hte orlando magicv in honor of his friend who was shot
    #43 brad daugherty wore this in honor of his favorite nascar driver, (the name escapes me)
    #23, MJ wore this because his brother was 45, he wanted to be half as good as his brother…
    #66 lemeuix wore this because he always wore gretzkys 99, but his agent encouraged him to make his own number so he turned the 99 upside down

    i’ll be back with more later[/quote]
    Daugherty’s #43 was for Richard Petty

    Mike Stanton of the Reds was wearing a cap with a grey underbill. The rest of the Reds had on the cap with the black underbill. Not sure how this is possible because the caps are new this year! Heres a screen grab. link

    [quote comment=”71815″]Nice touch by the Nats with the VT hats. Have teams done a moment of silence? What a sad story.[/quote]

    I know the Reds had one before yesterdays game.

    [quote comment=”71840″]Mike Stanton of the Reds was wearing a cap with a grey underbill. The rest of the Reds had on the cap with the black underbill. Not sure how this is possible because the caps are new this year! Heres a screen grab. link

    Last year the Reds had an all red alternate, my guess is that is where he got it.

    Sabres captain Chris Drury, former Little league world Series star, wears #23 in honor of his favorite baseball player, Don Mattingly

    The Wild! had a moment of silence tonight, but I am not sure if it was for the VaTech tragedy–I was flipping channels.

    Woo-hoo! The Christmas Trees won, no thanks to the incredibly poor ref job. The Trees will play another game, though not in the best hockey alts EVER! I am kidding, by the way, so no flaming, please. I like the red-and-greens, but I’m not THAT crazy.

    Lexie, I could wear jeans if I want (and I do wear sandals when it’s warmer out), but I don’t look good in jeans–so I stick to slacks.

    To the guys who think dressing up is a lost art–I wouldn’t wear an outfit like those Japanese women if my life depended on it. Once again, you have to have no body fat to get away with that look. Not going to happen. As for heels? Please.

    That said, I think clothing should befit the job. I agree with Sage Confucius that I wouldn’t take a job where I had to dress in a powersuit, but I do think if you are in the business world, you should dress up.

    [quote comment=”71740″][quote comment=”71685″][quote comment=”71672″]I just noticed a link on sale for the LA Galaxy on the MLS Store.

    It replaces the normal linkwith Yellow and Blue. Could this be the future colors/rebranding of the Galaxy?[/quote]

    Likely not. It’s a 2006 jersey, and they wore it for some occasion as a one off deal.[/quote]

    But did they wear that jersey last season? I don’t remember it…but then again, I don’t follow the Galaxy that closely.[/quote]

    Yep. They wore it. Went to the Galaxy site and found a game link it’s kinda small, but the shorts give it away. link a picture of the regular kit in action for comparison.

    Couple of pics of VT Nationals in link.

    As a student here at Virginia Tech, little things like this are a help (at least to me). It still hurts, but I appreciate the outpouring of support.

    [quote comment=”71651″]Was at two Blue Jays games this weekend – seems the new T cap has become their primary cap. While I didn’t like it at first, it is an improvement over the oversized J with bird. I even bought one – anyone else finding that the new caps are an 1/8 bigger than the old wool ones?[/quote]
    Johnny, haven’t tried one on yet..

    [quote comment=”71870″]Some links for the VT hats:

    link

    link

    …but Jerome Williams didn’t link[/quote]

    The story I read on that said that the hats didn’t get to RFK until the 2nd inning due to transit delays. Perhaps the Williams pic is from the first?

    As an almost-20-year-old who went to high school in Virginia, I knew quite a few kids who go to Tech. Thankfully, all of them are ok. I’m still just absolutely numb about the whole thing.

    [quote comment=”71872″]Couple of pics of VT Nationals in link.

    As a student here at Virginia Tech, little things like this are a help (at least to me). It still hurts, but I appreciate the outpouring of support.[/quote]

    Kyle O, I am sorry that you have to experience this awful tragedy (as well as all of the VaTech family). I am sending good thoughts and a healing light your way.

    Paul,

    The year escaes me, but in an All-Star game, Bryan Trottier of the Islanders couldn’t wear 19, so he wore 61 instead, because that way when he scored and raised his arms, it would be a 19, and he did score in that game as well.

    Sid Fernandez wore #50 in honor of his home state, Hawaii, the 50th state.

    Butch Goring wore 91 with the Islanders because Trottier was 19 and that’s what Goring wore in Los Angeles.

    Ray Bourque wore #77 because his #7 was retired while he was wearing it for Phil Esposito.

    Jim Otto and Omar Olivaras both wore #00 because of their names.

    Michael Jordan wore #45 in his second tour with Chicago as that’s what he wore in minor league baseball, and that was also his high school number.

    That’s good for now.
    Frank

    Gretzky wore 99 because I believe in his midget league, 9 was taken. 9 was gordie howes number, and waynes favorite, so he doubled it to make 99 to have the number he atleast wanted.

    Also ,Martin Biron wears 43 because he couldn’t wear 00 in the NHL because of rules and regulations.

    Sid Fernandez wore #50 in honor of his home state, Hawaii, the 50th state.

    actually there was a slugger on the Mets who wore 50 in honour of his home state Hawaii, Benny Agbayani

    speaking of the 3.14, there was a goalie for the local hockey team, the Odessa Jackalopes, a few years back named Billy Pi. I’m pretty sure he wore number three and his mask had pi signs all over it.

    not sure if anyone mentioned this yet but England’s Premier League has launched their new name & number font…
    link

    Giants Pitching Coach Dave Righetti gave up #19 to family friend, 2B/OF Kevin Frandsen, and took #46 in honor of Kirk Rueter.

    [quote comment=”71890″]speaking of the 3.14, there was a goalie for the local hockey team, the Odessa Jackalopes, a few years back named Billy Pi. I’m pretty sure he wore number three and his mask had pi signs all over it.[/quote]

    When Felix Pie first got his “real” uniform number this speing (I think he had 65 or 66 when he played spring training in 2006), I couldn’t help but wonder if they gave him 17 because it was 3+14.

    They should give him number 4 just to mock that school board who wanted to redefine one of math’s most important numbers!

    [quote comment=”71840″]Mike Stanton of the Reds was wearing a cap with a grey underbill. The rest of the Reds had on the cap with the black underbill. Not sure how this is possible because the caps are new this year! Heres a screen grab. link

    There’s about 5 players on the Mets that have the grey underbill also. Paul has pointed out a few times that most likely these players haven’t broken in the new hats yet.

    Back in the day, some refs would wear bow-ties, because they’re much harder than straight-ties to grab and jerk down in a donnybrook.

    Jim Harbaugh wore 4 in honor of Bobby Orr. Classy!

    [quote comment=”71836″][quote comment=”71827″]Off the top of my head for the numbers list
    #25, nick anderson for hte orlando magicv in honor of his friend who was shot
    #43 brad daugherty wore this in honor of his favorite nascar driver, (the name escapes me)
    #23, MJ wore this because his brother was 45, he wanted to be half as good as his brother…
    #66 lemeuix wore this because he always wore gretzkys 99, but his agent encouraged him to make his own number so he turned the 99 upside down

    i’ll be back with more later[/quote]
    Daugherty’s #43 was for Richard Petty[/quote]

    Dennis Rodman wore 10 with the Pistons, then when he went to the Bulls 10 was retired for Bob Love, so he chose 91 because 9 + 1 = 10. I also believe he wore 73 for the Mavs for the same reason. I know he played for the Lakers, too, but I’m not sure what number he wore for them.

Comments are closed.